Log in
Sign up for FREE
arrow_back
Library

Retake Objective 5: Stability, change, and biodiversity.

star
star
star
star
star
Last updated almost 5 years ago
7 questions
4
HS-LS2-2
4
HS-LS2-6
4
HS-LS2-6
4
HS-LS2-2
4
HS-LS2-6
4
HS-LS2-6
4
HS-LS2-2
HS-LS2-6
Question 1
1.

This is a two part question: Which ecosystem has more biodiversity? Explain how you know!

Question 2
2.

Which of the following provides evidence to support the claim: If all the phytoplankton were killed in both ecosystems, ecosystem A would remain more stable.

Question 3
3.

Which of the following statements would be included in a reasoning that supports the claim: This ecosystem would not remain stable if the wolves were removed. SELECT 1 ANSWER!

Question 4
4.


This is a two part question. In the ecosystem pictured, which of the following would result in the LARGEST decrease in BIODIVERSITY? Explain your reasoning in GREAT detail!
A. A virus wiping out the seaweed population.
B. A bacteria infesting all the crabs.
C. A fisherman killing 10 fish in one day.
D. A Dead Zone as described in question 7

Question 5
5.

Which graph below represents the response of the rainbow trout population to a ban on fishing? Note: The star in each graph marks the start of the fishing ban. You may add a comment to defend your answer, but you don't have to---sometimes you can select the wrong answer but defend it well enough that I can mark it correct.


Question 6
6.

Question 7
7.

What evidence could BEST be used to support the claim: Dead zones decrease biodiversity in ecosystems as stability is not able to be maintained.

In ecosystem A the absence of phytoplankton would result in the absence of all species, in ecosystem B the absence of phytoplankton would result in the absence of all species except the whale.
If the voles were removed, the elk and coyote would keep the grass grains and fruits in check.
If the voles were removed the gray wolves would die.
If the wolves were removed the elk, coyote and vole would increase in population but not drastically.
If the wolves were removed the elk, coyote and vole would increase to too large of a population size that they would completely destroy all the grass grains and fruits and eventually decrease in population size themselves due to overgrazing. (Just like the rabbits did that were introduced to Australia)
If the voles were removed, the grasses, grains and fruits would grow out of control.
If the voles were removed the gray wolves would eat coyote or elk instead.
D
Students looked at the evidence below, they made a claim to answer the question: Which factor below is the main factor leading to the decreasing clarity in Lake Tahoe? They then wrote a reasoning to support their claim. Which students' answer is BEST?

Secchi disk data showing the clarity in Lake Tahoe over time.

Graph showing the clarity of Lake Tahoe in relationship to the Mysis Shrimp presence. The first caption is from 2011.


This graph shows the nitrogen concentration in Lake Tahoe from runoff, over time.



This graph shows the phosphorous concentration in Lake Tahoe from runoff, over time.

Sediment:
Mackenzie: Sediments are the main cause of the decreasing clarity in Lake Tahoe. The images show what an ecosystem with high sediment runoff accumulation looks like and what that of Lake Tahoe currently looks like. These images look very similar so we can assume the sediment from excessive rainfall and parking lots are the cause of the decreasing clarity in Lake Tahoe.