Biconditionals & Deductive Reasoning

1

Rewrite the definition as a biconditional. Squares have four congruent sides and four congruent angles.

1

Rewrite the definition as a biconditional. Isosceles trapezoids have two opposite congruent sides.

1

Which law of deductive reasoning would you use to make a conclusion from the given true statements? If it's not possible, state "no conclusion."
If you exercise regularly, then you will have a healthier heart.
Ben exercises regularly.

1

Which law of deductive reasoning would you use to make a conclusion from the given true statements? If it's not possible, state "no conclusion."
If fleas fret, then dogs whine. If dogs whine, then cats purr.

1

Which law of deductive reasoning would you use to make a conclusion from the given true statements? If it's not possible, state "no conclusion."
If the lawn mower is working, then you can cut the grass. If you cut the grass, then you have a chance to win the “Best Lawn in the Neighborhood” award.

1

Which law of deductive reasoning would you use to make a conclusion from the given true statements? If it's not possible, state "no conclusion."
If the fuel gauge on a car is pointing to “E,” then it is time to fill up the gas tank.
The fuel gauge in Jani’s car is pointing to “E.”

1

Name the property that justifies the statement.
m<ABC = m<DEF and m<DEF = m<ABC

1

Name the property that justifies the statement.
AB = CD, CD = EF. Therefore, AB = EF.

1

Name the property that justifies statement 2.
1. x + 7 = 5
2. x + 7 - 7 = 5 - 7

1

Biconditionals & Deductive Reasoning

Rewrite the definition as a biconditional. Squares have four congruent sides and four congruent angles.

Rewrite the definition as a biconditional. Isosceles trapezoids have two opposite congruent sides.

Which law of deductive reasoning would you use to make a conclusion from the given true statements? If it's not possible, state "no conclusion."
If you exercise regularly, then you will have a healthier heart.
Ben exercises regularly.

Which law of deductive reasoning would you use to make a conclusion from the given true statements? If it's not possible, state "no conclusion."
If fleas fret, then dogs whine. If dogs whine, then cats purr.

Which law of deductive reasoning would you use to make a conclusion from the given true statements? If it's not possible, state "no conclusion."
If the fuel gauge on a car is pointing to “E,” then it is time to fill up the gas tank.
The fuel gauge in Jani’s car is pointing to “E.”

Name the property that justifies the statement.
m<ABC = m<DEF and m<DEF = m<ABC

Name the property that justifies the statement.
AB = CD, CD = EF. Therefore, AB = EF.

Name the property that justifies statement 2.
1. x + 7 = 5
2. x + 7 - 7 = 5 - 7

Name the property that justifies the statement.
<A is congruent to <A

Rewrite the definition as a biconditional. Squares have four congruent sides and four congruent angles.

Rewrite the definition as a biconditional. Isosceles trapezoids have two opposite congruent sides.

Which law of deductive reasoning would you use to make a conclusion from the given true statements? If it's not possible, state "no conclusion."
If you exercise regularly, then you will have a healthier heart.
Ben exercises regularly.

Which law of deductive reasoning would you use to make a conclusion from the given true statements? If it's not possible, state "no conclusion."
If fleas fret, then dogs whine. If dogs whine, then cats purr.

Which law of deductive reasoning would you use to make a conclusion from the given true statements? If it's not possible, state "no conclusion."
If the fuel gauge on a car is pointing to “E,” then it is time to fill up the gas tank.
The fuel gauge in Jani’s car is pointing to “E.”

Name the property that justifies the statement.
m<ABC = m<DEF and m<DEF = m<ABC

Name the property that justifies the statement.
AB = CD, CD = EF. Therefore, AB = EF.

Name the property that justifies statement 2.
1. x + 7 = 5
2. x + 7 - 7 = 5 - 7

Name the property that justifies the statement.
<A is congruent to <A

Biconditionals & Deductive Reasoning

Biconditionals & Deductive Reasoning

Rewrite the definition as a biconditional. Squares have four congruent sides and four congruent angles.

Rewrite the definition as a biconditional. Isosceles trapezoids have two opposite congruent sides.

Which law of deductive reasoning would you use to make a conclusion from the given true statements? If it's not possible, state "no conclusion."If you exercise regularly, then you will have a healthier heart. Ben exercises regularly.

Which law of deductive reasoning would you use to make a conclusion from the given true statements? If it's not possible, state "no conclusion."If fleas fret, then dogs whine. If dogs whine, then cats purr.

Which law of deductive reasoning would you use to make a conclusion from the given true statements? If it's not possible, state "no conclusion."If the fuel gauge on a car is pointing to “E,” then it is time to fill up the gas tank. The fuel gauge in Jani’s car is pointing to “E.”

Name the property that justifies the statement.m<ABC = m<DEF and m<DEF = m<ABC

Name the property that justifies the statement.AB = CD, CD = EF. Therefore, AB = EF.

Name the property that justifies statement 2.1. x + 7 = 52. x + 7 - 7 = 5 - 7

Name the property that justifies the statement.<A is congruent to <A

Rewrite the definition as a biconditional. Squares have four congruent sides and four congruent angles.

Rewrite the definition as a biconditional. Isosceles trapezoids have two opposite congruent sides.

Which law of deductive reasoning would you use to make a conclusion from the given true statements? If it's not possible, state "no conclusion."If you exercise regularly, then you will have a healthier heart. Ben exercises regularly.

Which law of deductive reasoning would you use to make a conclusion from the given true statements? If it's not possible, state "no conclusion."If fleas fret, then dogs whine. If dogs whine, then cats purr.

Which law of deductive reasoning would you use to make a conclusion from the given true statements? If it's not possible, state "no conclusion."If the fuel gauge on a car is pointing to “E,” then it is time to fill up the gas tank. The fuel gauge in Jani’s car is pointing to “E.”

Name the property that justifies the statement.m<ABC = m<DEF and m<DEF = m<ABC

Name the property that justifies the statement.AB = CD, CD = EF. Therefore, AB = EF.

Name the property that justifies statement 2.1. x + 7 = 52. x + 7 - 7 = 5 - 7

Name the property that justifies the statement.<A is congruent to <A

Which law of deductive reasoning would you use to make a conclusion from the given true statements? If it's not possible, state "no conclusion."
If you exercise regularly, then you will have a healthier heart.
Ben exercises regularly.

Which law of deductive reasoning would you use to make a conclusion from the given true statements? If it's not possible, state "no conclusion."
If fleas fret, then dogs whine. If dogs whine, then cats purr.

Which law of deductive reasoning would you use to make a conclusion from the given true statements? If it's not possible, state "no conclusion."
If the fuel gauge on a car is pointing to “E,” then it is time to fill up the gas tank.
The fuel gauge in Jani’s car is pointing to “E.”

Name the property that justifies the statement.
m<ABC = m<DEF and m<DEF = m<ABC

Name the property that justifies the statement.
AB = CD, CD = EF. Therefore, AB = EF.

Name the property that justifies statement 2.
1. x + 7 = 5
2. x + 7 - 7 = 5 - 7

Name the property that justifies the statement.
<A is congruent to <A

Which law of deductive reasoning would you use to make a conclusion from the given true statements? If it's not possible, state "no conclusion."
If you exercise regularly, then you will have a healthier heart.
Ben exercises regularly.

Which law of deductive reasoning would you use to make a conclusion from the given true statements? If it's not possible, state "no conclusion."
If fleas fret, then dogs whine. If dogs whine, then cats purr.

Which law of deductive reasoning would you use to make a conclusion from the given true statements? If it's not possible, state "no conclusion."
If the fuel gauge on a car is pointing to “E,” then it is time to fill up the gas tank.
The fuel gauge in Jani’s car is pointing to “E.”

Name the property that justifies the statement.
m<ABC = m<DEF and m<DEF = m<ABC

Name the property that justifies the statement.
AB = CD, CD = EF. Therefore, AB = EF.

Name the property that justifies statement 2.
1. x + 7 = 5
2. x + 7 - 7 = 5 - 7

Name the property that justifies the statement.
<A is congruent to <A