PS3-1, PS3-4 and ESS2-4 Assessment- Evaluating an Engineering Design Solution

Last updated over 3 years ago

13 questions

DIRECTIONS:
You can work on your assessment using your resources-- Any notes you have, resources on the chemistry calendar, and your group members. You can take pictures of any work and also add on to it if you need to revise.  You can discuss ideas, However, everyone MUST write their own responses without copying word from word from another student

*Check Google Classroom under Unit 1 to see if you have a checklist or teacher notes that you can use on this assessment.

YOU CAN RESUBMIT AFTER THIS IS GRADED AT ANY TIME.
REMEMBER TO REVISE YOUR WORK AND THEN CLICK ON THE BLUE COMMENT BUTTON TO LEAVE A COMMENT THAT YOU UPDATED YOUR WORK SO THAT WE KNOW TO REGRADE IT :)

PART 1- DENSITY OF WATER TYPES INVESTIGATION
PS3-4- Thermal Equilbrium 
Rubric: 

4- All parts of the lab investigation are included, specific, and accurate based on the checklist provided in question 1
3-Mostly accurate or missing 1-2 requirements  level 4
2- Some inaccuracies or missing parts from level 4
1- Missing or mostly inaccurate information 

Find your notes on 1.7 Density of Water types Lab 

Here are lab videos to remind you of this lab and/or to use if you were absent. 

PS3-1, PS3-4 and ESS2-4 Assessment- Evaluating an Engineering Design Solution

DIRECTIONS:

PART 1- DENSITY OF WATER TYPES INVESTIGATION

PS3-4- Thermal Equilbrium

DIRECTIONS:

PART 1- DENSITY OF WATER TYPES INVESTIGATION

PS3-4- Thermal Equilbrium

Did you include all required parts for this section? Choose all that apply. (Remember if you did not, to add missing information to question 1 that is not on your poster!)

Use the checklist from the previous question and the rubric given to the left to give yourself a level rating (Level 1-4). Explain your reasoning for your rating and how you think you can improve.

PART 2- Analyzing interfaces that cause ice melt

ESS2-4- Energy flow and Climate

PS3-1- Change in heat energy between systems

Check that you included all parts of your CER. Choose all that apply.

Use the checklist from the previous question and the rubric given to the left to give yourself a level rating (Level 1-4) . Explain your reasoning for your rating and how you think you can improve.

Make sure that you turned in your 1.9 Debate Preparation document

You can also add it here if you did this electronically or take pictures of it.

What was the most helpful part of the process of preparing for the debate?

What was the most difficult part of preparing for the debate? Was there anything that we could have done better as teachers to prepare you?

Evaluate your performance during the debate. Which best describes your preparation and how you think you did.

What did you learn better about the content (heat transfer, engineering design etc.) or about yourself (preparing, practicing, coming up with questions or responses in the moment etc.)
by doing this debate.

What do you think we should consider changing to improve the debate in the future? (i.e. format or questions on preparation document, time given for each part of the debate, a part of the debate missing that we can add...etc.)

Did you include all required parts for this section? Choose all that apply. (Remember if you did not, to add missing information to question 1 that is not on your poster!)

Use the checklist from the previous question and the rubric given to the left to give yourself a level rating (Level 1-4). Explain your reasoning for your rating and how you think you can improve.

PART 2- Analyzing interfaces that cause ice melt

ESS2-4- Energy flow and Climate

PS3-1- Change in heat energy between systems

Check that you included all parts of your CER. Choose all that apply.

Use the checklist from the previous question and the rubric given to the left to give yourself a level rating (Level 1-4) . Explain your reasoning for your rating and how you think you can improve.

Make sure that you turned in your 1.9 Debate Preparation document

You can also add it here if you did this electronically or take pictures of it.

What was the most helpful part of the process of preparing for the debate?

What was the most difficult part of preparing for the debate? Was there anything that we could have done better as teachers to prepare you?

Evaluate your performance during the debate. Which best describes your preparation and how you think you did.

What did you learn better about the content (heat transfer, engineering design etc.) or about yourself (preparing, practicing, coming up with questions or responses in the moment etc.)
by doing this debate.

What do you think we should consider changing to improve the debate in the future? (i.e. format or questions on preparation document, time given for each part of the debate, a part of the debate missing that we can add...etc.)

PS3-1, PS3-4 and ESS2-4 Assessment- Evaluating an Engineering Design Solution

DIRECTIONS:

PART 1- DENSITY OF WATER TYPES INVESTIGATION

PS3-4- Thermal Equilbrium

DIRECTIONS:

PART 1- DENSITY OF WATER TYPES INVESTIGATION

PS3-4- Thermal Equilbrium

Did you include all required parts for this section? Choose all that apply. (Remember if you did not, to add missing information to question 1 that is not on your poster!)

Use the checklist from the previous question and the rubric given to the left to give yourself a level rating (Level 1-4). Explain your reasoning for your rating and how you think you can improve.

PART 2- Analyzing interfaces that cause ice melt

ESS2-4- Energy flow and Climate

PS3-1- Change in heat energy between systems

Check that you included all parts of your CER. Choose all that apply.

Use the checklist from the previous question and the rubric given to the left to give yourself a level rating (Level 1-4) . Explain your reasoning for your rating and how you think you can improve.

Make sure that you turned in your 1.9 Debate Preparation documentYou can also add it here if you did this electronically or take pictures of it.

What was the most helpful part of the process of preparing for the debate?

What was the most difficult part of preparing for the debate? Was there anything that we could have done better as teachers to prepare you?

Evaluate your performance during the debate. Which best describes your preparation and how you think you did.

What did you learn better about the content (heat transfer, engineering design etc.) or about yourself (preparing, practicing, coming up with questions or responses in the moment etc.) by doing this debate.

What do you think we should consider changing to improve the debate in the future? (i.e. format or questions on preparation document, time given for each part of the debate, a part of the debate missing that we can add...etc.)

Did you include all required parts for this section? Choose all that apply. (Remember if you did not, to add missing information to question 1 that is not on your poster!)

Use the checklist from the previous question and the rubric given to the left to give yourself a level rating (Level 1-4). Explain your reasoning for your rating and how you think you can improve.

PART 2- Analyzing interfaces that cause ice melt

ESS2-4- Energy flow and Climate

PS3-1- Change in heat energy between systems

Check that you included all parts of your CER. Choose all that apply.

Use the checklist from the previous question and the rubric given to the left to give yourself a level rating (Level 1-4) . Explain your reasoning for your rating and how you think you can improve.

Make sure that you turned in your 1.9 Debate Preparation documentYou can also add it here if you did this electronically or take pictures of it.

What was the most helpful part of the process of preparing for the debate?

What was the most difficult part of preparing for the debate? Was there anything that we could have done better as teachers to prepare you?

Evaluate your performance during the debate. Which best describes your preparation and how you think you did.

What did you learn better about the content (heat transfer, engineering design etc.) or about yourself (preparing, practicing, coming up with questions or responses in the moment etc.) by doing this debate.

What do you think we should consider changing to improve the debate in the future? (i.e. format or questions on preparation document, time given for each part of the debate, a part of the debate missing that we can add...etc.)

Make sure that you turned in your 1.9 Debate Preparation document

You can also add it here if you did this electronically or take pictures of it.

What did you learn better about the content (heat transfer, engineering design etc.) or about yourself (preparing, practicing, coming up with questions or responses in the moment etc.)
by doing this debate.

Make sure that you turned in your 1.9 Debate Preparation document

You can also add it here if you did this electronically or take pictures of it.

What did you learn better about the content (heat transfer, engineering design etc.) or about yourself (preparing, practicing, coming up with questions or responses in the moment etc.)
by doing this debate.