[AP Statistics] Chapter 9.1a Classwork
By Oliver Khamky
starstarstarstarstarstarstarstarstarstar
Last updated 10 months ago
6 Questions
1
1.
Lumber companies dry freshly cut boards in kilns before selling them. As a result of the drying process, a certain percentage of the boards crack. The current drying procedure is known to produce cracks in 16% of the boards. The drying supervisor wants to test a new method to determine if fewer boards will crack.
What is the null hypothesis (H0)? Be sure to define the parameter of interest.
Lumber companies dry freshly cut boards in kilns before selling them. As a result of the drying process, a certain percentage of the boards crack. The current drying procedure is known to produce cracks in 16% of the boards. The drying supervisor wants to test a new method to determine if fewer boards will crack.
What is the null hypothesis (H0)? Be sure to define the parameter of interest.
1
2.
What is the alternate hypothesis (Ha)?
What is the alternate hypothesis (Ha)?
1
3.
Is the alternate hypothesis one or two sided?
Is the alternate hypothesis one or two sided?
1
4.
Lumber companies dry freshly cut boards in kilns before selling them. As a result of the drying process, a
certain percentage of the boards crack. The current drying procedure is known to produce cracks in 16% of the boards. The drying supervisor wants to test a new method to determine if fewer boards will crack.
To investigate, he selected an SRS of 50 boards, dried them using the new method, and found 5 that cracked ( pˆ = 5 / 50 = 0.10) . To determine if these data provide convincing evidence that less than 16% of the boards will crack when using the new method, 100 trials of a simulation were conducted. Each dot in the graph below shows the proportion of boards that cracked in a random sample of 50 boards, assuming that each board has a 16% chance of cracking
Use the simulation results to estimate the P-value of the test. Intepret the value.
Lumber companies dry freshly cut boards in kilns before selling them. As a result of the drying process, a
certain percentage of the boards crack. The current drying procedure is known to produce cracks in 16% of the boards. The drying supervisor wants to test a new method to determine if fewer boards will crack.
To investigate, he selected an SRS of 50 boards, dried them using the new method, and found 5 that cracked ( pˆ = 5 / 50 = 0.10) . To determine if these data provide convincing evidence that less than 16% of the boards will crack when using the new method, 100 trials of a simulation were conducted. Each dot in the graph below shows the proportion of boards that cracked in a random sample of 50 boards, assuming that each board has a 16% chance of cracking
Use the simulation results to estimate the P-value of the test. Intepret the value.
1
5.
Based on the p-value above, what would you conclude at a significance level of 10%?
Based on the p-value above, what would you conclude at a significance level of 10%?
1
6.
How about with a significance level of 5%?
How about with a significance level of 5%?