Log inSign up for FREE
Library

Colonization DBQ AJB

Last updated almost 4 years ago
5 questions
Directions: The following question is based on the accompanying documents. As you analyze the documents, take into account both the source of the document and the author’s point of view. Take note of both the postives and negative effects on both the Europeans and African because you will have to write an short essay on the following question:

What were the positive and negative effects of imperialism for the colonizer and the colony?
Historical Context:

European imperialism in the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries resulted in the carving up of areas of Africa and Asia into vast colonial empires. This was true for most of the continent of Africa. As imperialism spread, the colonizer and the colony viewed imperialism differently. They saw both positive and negative effects of imperialism.
Sekou Toure, and African nationalist, pointed out another negative aspect of imperialism.

Colonialism’s greatest misdeed was to have tried to strip us of our responsibility in conducting our own affairs and convince us that our civilization was nothing less than savagery, thus giving us complexes which led to our being branded as irresponsible and lacking in self-confidence.
1

What criticism of imperialism does this African offer?

This excerpt is adapted from Imperialism by J.A. Hobson, a British scholar.

The period of imperialism has witnessed many wars. Most of these wars have been caused by attacks of white races upon so-called “lower races.” They have resulted in the taking of territory by force. . . . The white rulers of the colonies live at the expense of the natives. Their chief work is to organize labor for their support. In the typical colony, the most fertile lands and the mineral resources are owned by white foreigners. These holdings are worked by natives under their direction. The foreigners take wealth out of the country. All the hard work is done by natives.
1

What negative aspects of imperialism does this British scholar point out?

George H.T. Kimble, in a 1962 New York Times Magazine article, “Colonialism: the Good, the Bad, the Lessons,” gives his point of view

. . . . they [the colonial powers] failed to provide the African with sufficient [preparation] . . . None of the newly independent countries had enough skilled African administrators to run their own . . . [or] enough African technicians to keep the public utilities working. . . . And no country had an electorate that knew what independence was all about. . . . For all its faults, colonial government provided security of person and property in lands that had known little or either. . . . It was the colonial powers who were largely responsible for the opening of the region to the lumberman, miner, planter, and other men of means without whom its wealth would be continued to lie fallow [uncultivated].
1

What does this author cite as negative effects of imperialism?

1

What does he cite as positive effects of imperialism?

This excerpt, adapted from Balance Sheets of Imperialism by Grover Clark, points out other negative aspects of imperialism.

The struggle for colonies does not result only in cash losses. There were also lives lost, wars fought, and hatreds aroused which threatened new wars. . . .Italy’s trade with her colonies in 1894-1932 was worth 5,561 million lire [about $1,100 million]. This was less than one percent of her total foreign trade in the same period. In fact, her expenditures on colonies for that time was 6,856 million lire. Obviously colonies cost more than they are worth in trade.
1

What evidence does this author provide to show that colonies were a negative financial drain on the Europeans?