Content Objective: I will be able to evaluate the legal claims that support and refute the Supreme Court’s ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson.
Standard Objective: I will be able to identify claims and counterclaims explicitly stated in text or determine implicit claims and counterclaims from text.
Content Objective: I will be able to evaluate the legal claims that support and refute the Supreme Court’s ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson.
Standard Objective: I will be able to identify claims and counterclaims explicitly stated in text or determine implicit claims and counterclaims from text.
Warm Up: Please rate how well you understood last night's pre-work on a scale from 1 to 4. If you have any questions, drop them in the "Show Your Work" area.
Warm Up: Do you feel like people are separated by race in the United States (i.e. segregation)? Explain.
Warm Up: One interesting historical fact I learned from the pre-work is…



What kinds of laws does the Court say that state legislatures have the rightful power to pass?
What does the Court say is the basic flaw in Plessy’s argument?
What does the Court argue about laws that try to abolish racial prejudices?

What does the dissenting opinion mean by “Our constitution is color-blind”?
What does the dissenting opinion claim is the “real meaning” of the Louisiana segregation law?

How does this photograph from 1940 reveal the legacy of the Plessy decision?

Exit Ticket: What are the flaws of the Majority Opinion [Document B]? Explain why using ideas from the Dissenting Opinion [Document C] of Plessy v. Ferguson (1896).
Exit Ticket: Please evaluate how well you understood today’s lesson on a scale from 1 to 4:
How does the decision in Plessy affirm the doctrine [legal theory] of “separate but equal”?