Revising - Multiple Choice Practice Choose the best answer for each passage.
star
star
star
star
star
Last updated over 3 years ago
9 questions
Required
1
The writer desires to insert descriptors in front of the word “army” in Sentence 1 (adjusting, if necessary, the article that precedes it) that would capture these young crusaders’ zealous commitment to taking back the Holy Land. Of the following, which would BEST suit her purpose?
The writer desires to insert descriptors in front of the word “army” in Sentence 1 (adjusting, if necessary, the article that precedes it) that would capture these young crusaders’ zealous commitment to taking back the Holy Land. Of the following, which would BEST suit her purpose?
Required
1
The writer is considering replacing the underlined phrase in Sentence 2 (reproduced below):
Truth be told, this foray was anything but a ‘crusade’ and nothing close to successful because a true Crusade required Papal support and approval, something the Children’s Crusade apparently lacked.
Which of the following would be her BEST course of action?
The writer is considering replacing the underlined phrase in Sentence 2 (reproduced below):
Truth be told, this foray was anything but a ‘crusade’ and nothing close to successful because a true Crusade required Papal support and approval, something the Children’s Crusade apparently lacked.
Which of the following would be her BEST course of action?
1
The writer wishes to alter the underlined word in Sentence 3 (reproduced below):
Also, the word “pueri,” Latin for young boys, is a malapropism since it wrongly connotes the male gender when the term is believed by one scholar to refer to an entire impoverished social class that might have included “puelle” (girls) and even the aged and the infirm.
What action should she take?
The writer wishes to alter the underlined word in Sentence 3 (reproduced below):
Also, the word “pueri,” Latin for young boys, is a malapropism since it wrongly connotes the male gender when the term is believed by one scholar to refer to an entire impoverished social class that might have included “puelle” (girls) and even the aged and the infirm.
What action should she take?
Required
1
The writer would like to include the following sentence somewhere in the first part of her commentary:
Moreover, the fact that these ‘crusaders’ were unarmed belies any consideration of them as a serious military threat.
What change should she make?
The writer would like to include the following sentence somewhere in the first part of her commentary:
Moreover, the fact that these ‘crusaders’ were unarmed belies any consideration of them as a serious military threat.
What change should she make?
Required
1
The writer is considering inserting the following after Sentence 5:
If history is any barometer, plenty.
All of the following would be valid reasons for doing so EXCEPT:
The writer is considering inserting the following after Sentence 5:
If history is any barometer, plenty.
All of the following would be valid reasons for doing so EXCEPT:
Required
1
The writer realizes that sentences 7, 8 and 9 are not sentences but fragments. Which of the following would BEST address this syntax error as well as strengthen the paragraph’s structural integrity?
The writer realizes that sentences 7, 8 and 9 are not sentences but fragments. Which of the following would BEST address this syntax error as well as strengthen the paragraph’s structural integrity?
Required
1
The writer would like to combine Sentences 11 and 12. Which of the following would be the LEAST compelling reason to combine these two sentences?
The writer would like to combine Sentences 11 and 12. Which of the following would be the LEAST compelling reason to combine these two sentences?
Required
1
The writer is considering deleting Sentence 14. Should she make this change?
The writer is considering deleting Sentence 14. Should she make this change?
Required
1
The writer likes the allusion to Thomas Paine but is unsure whether it adds or detracts from her commentary. What would you advise her to do?
The writer likes the allusion to Thomas Paine but is unsure whether it adds or detracts from her commentary. What would you advise her to do?