Chapter 3 Test cloned 12/15/2022

Last updated almost 3 years ago

18 questions

Note from the author:

Instructions

Untitled Section

Required

9.3.LW-LEG.4

Required

9.3.LW-LEG.6

Required

9.3.LW-LEG.6

Required

9.3.LW-LEG.6

Required

9.3.LW-LEG.6

Required

9.3.LW-LEG.3

Supreme Court Decisions - You must answer at least one of Plessy or Brown and the Miranda question

Chapter 3 Test cloned 12/15/2022

Last updated almost 3 years ago

18 questions

Note from the author:

DOUBLE TEST GRADE

Answer 1-6: Choose the best Answer. For the Plessy & Brown essay, choose one to construct an IRAC response (issue / rule / appliation / conclusion).  If you complete both, it will be used as extra credit.  The Miranda Question is mandatory. Open Book / Open Note - Ask questions

Respuesta 1-6: Elija la mejor respuesta. Para el ensayo de Plessy & Brown, elija uno para construir una respuesta IRAC (problema / regla / aplicación / conclusión).  Si completa ambos, se utilizará como crédito adicional.  Open Book / Open Note - Hacer preguntas

Instructions

DOUBLE TEST GRADE

Answer 1-6: Choose the best Answer. For the Plessy & Brown essay, choose one to construct an IRAC response (issue / rule / appliation / conclusion).  If you complete both, it will be used as extra credit.  The Miranda Question is mandatory. Open Book / Open Note - Ask questions

Respuesta 1-6: Elija la mejor respuesta. Para el ensayo de Plessy & Brown, elija uno para construir una respuesta IRAC (problema / regla / aplicación / conclusión).  Si completa ambos, se utilizará como crédito adicional.  Open Book / Open Note - Hacer preguntas

Untitled Section

Required

Attorneys are permitted to conduct of potential jurors, the process of asking questions to discover potential biases and mindset.

A los abogados se les permite llevar a cabo _____

9.3.LW-LEG.4

Required

The authority to hear a case first, usually the trial court, is called _ jurisdiction.

La autoridad para escuchar un caso primero, generalmente el tribunal de primera instancia, se llama jurisdicción _____________

9.3.LW-LEG.6

Required

Match the US Court to the correct level.

Haga coincidir la Corte de los Estados Unidos con el nivel correcto.

Draggable item		Corresponding Item
US Supreme Court / Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos		Highest Court / Tribunal Supremo
Federal Circuit Court of Appeals / Tribunal de Apelaciones del Circuito de los Estados Unidos		Court of Appeals / Tribunal de apelación
Federal District Court / Tribunal de Distrito de los Estados Unidos		Trial Court / Tribunal de Primera Instancia

9.3.LW-LEG.6

Required

Match the NJ Court to the correct level

Draggable item		Corresponding Item
NJ Supreme Court		Highest State Court
Superior Court - Appellate Division		Court of Appeals
NJ Superior Court		Trial Court

9.3.LW-LEG.6

Required

Move each case to the court with the proper jurisdiction (State or Federal). Use the chart above to assist.

Draggable item		Corresponding Item
Students at East Orange Campus claim a violation of their 14th Amendment Rights because their school lunch stinks		Federal

9.3.LW-LEG.6

Required

Describe concepts of Precedent and Stare Decisis and why they are important to the US legal system.

Describir los conceptos de Precedent y Stare Decisis y por qué son importantes para el sistema legal de los Estados Unidos.

9.3.LW-LEG.3

Supreme Court Decisions - You must answer at least one of Plessy or Brown and the Miranda question

IRAC - Response

What was the issue in Plessy v. Fergusson?

9.3.LW-LEG.3

9.3.LW-LEG.6

Rule: The rule being applied by the SCOTUS in Plessy is the _______ Amendment

9.3.LW-LEG.6

IRAC - Response

* Issue:

9.3.LW-LEG.3

9.3.LW-LEG.6

Rule: The SCOTUS applied the _______ Amendment - equal protection clause to the case

In 1995, teenagers Michael Alvarado and Paul Soto attempted to steal a truck in a shopping mall parking lot in Santa Fe Springs, California. Alvarado approached the passenger side door of the truck, and Soto, holding a .357 Magnum pistol, approached the driver. The driver refused to give Soto the keys, so Soto shot and killed him. Alvarado then helped Soto hide the gun.

Both Alvarado and Soto were convicted of second-degree murder and robbery. Alvarado was convicted in large part because of incriminating statements he made about his involvement in the shooting during a two-hour interview with a police detective about a month after the murder.

At the time of the interview, Alvarado was a 17-year-old high school student. The detective contacted Alvarado’s mother, who agreed to bring him to the police station for questioning. When Alvarado arrived with his parents, the detective denied the parents’ request to remain with their son during the interview. While they waited in the lobby, Alvarado was questioned alone. During the two-hour session, the detective twice asked Alvarado if he wanted to take a break. Alvarado admitted to his role in the killing. At the end of the interview he went home. Alvarado was never advised that he had a right to remain silent, to consult a lawyer prior to answering questions, or to leave the police station.

a. What are the strongest arguments that Alvarado should have been given Miranda warnings at the beginning of the questioning by the detective?

un. ¿Cuáles son los argumentos más fuertes de que Alvarado debería haber recibido advertencias de Miranda al comienzo del interrogatorio por parte del detective?

b. What are the strongest arguments that there was no need to give Alvarado Miranda warnings in these circumstances?

B. ¿Cuáles son los argumentos más fuertes de que no hubo necesidad de dar advertencias a Alvarado Miranda en estas circunstancias?

c. If you were a judge on an appeals court hearing this case, how would you analyze the issue of whether Alvarado was in custody and being interrogated? Should his age and experience be a factor? Explain.

c. Si usted fuera juez en un tribunal de apelaciones que escuchó este caso, ¿cómo analizaría el tema de si Alvarado estaba bajo custodia y estaba siendo interrogado? ¿Debería su edad y experiencia ser un factor? explicar.

d. Should Alvarado have done anything differently? Should the detective have done anything differently?

d. ¿Debería Alvarado haber hecho algo diferente? ¿Debería el detective haber hecho algo diferente?

Chapter 3 Test cloned 12/15/2022

Chapter 3 Test cloned 12/15/2022

Attorneys are permitted to conduct of potential jurors, the process of asking questions to discover potential biases and mindset.

A los abogados se les permite llevar a cabo _____

The authority to hear a case first, usually the trial court, is called _ jurisdiction.

La autoridad para escuchar un caso primero, generalmente el tribunal de primera instancia, se llama jurisdicción _____________

Match the US Court to the correct level.

Haga coincidir la Corte de los Estados Unidos con el nivel correcto.

Match the NJ Court to the correct level

Move each case to the court with the proper jurisdiction (State or Federal). Use the chart above to assist.

Describe concepts of Precedent and Stare Decisis and why they are important to the US legal system.

Describir los conceptos de Precedent y Stare Decisis y por qué son importantes para el sistema legal de los Estados Unidos.

IRAC - Response

What was the issue in Plessy v. Fergusson?

IRAC - Response

* Issue:

b. What are the strongest arguments that there was no need to give Alvarado Miranda warnings in these circumstances?

B. ¿Cuáles son los argumentos más fuertes de que no hubo necesidad de dar advertencias a Alvarado Miranda en estas circunstancias?

d. Should Alvarado have done anything differently? Should the detective have done anything differently?

d. ¿Debería Alvarado haber hecho algo diferente? ¿Debería el detective haber hecho algo diferente?

Attorneys are permitted to conduct of potential jurors, the process of asking questions to discover potential biases and mindset.

A los abogados se les permite llevar a cabo _____

The authority to hear a case first, usually the trial court, is called _ jurisdiction.

La autoridad para escuchar un caso primero, generalmente el tribunal de primera instancia, se llama jurisdicción _____________

Match the US Court to the correct level.

Haga coincidir la Corte de los Estados Unidos con el nivel correcto.

Match the NJ Court to the correct level

Move each case to the court with the proper jurisdiction (State or Federal). Use the chart above to assist.

Describe concepts of Precedent and Stare Decisis and why they are important to the US legal system.

Describir los conceptos de Precedent y Stare Decisis y por qué son importantes para el sistema legal de los Estados Unidos.

IRAC - Response

What was the issue in Plessy v. Fergusson?

Analysis: How did the SCOTUS apply the rule to the law? What test did they create?

Conclusion: What did the SCOTUS decide?

IRAC - Response

* Issue:

Analysis:

Conclusion:

b. What are the strongest arguments that there was no need to give Alvarado Miranda warnings in these circumstances?

B. ¿Cuáles son los argumentos más fuertes de que no hubo necesidad de dar advertencias a Alvarado Miranda en estas circunstancias?

d. Should Alvarado have done anything differently? Should the detective have done anything differently?

d. ¿Debería Alvarado haber hecho algo diferente? ¿Debería el detective haber hecho algo diferente?

Analysis: How did the SCOTUS apply the rule to the law? What test did they create?

Conclusion: What did the SCOTUS decide?

Conclusion:

Draggable item		Corresponding Item
Students at East Orange Campus claim a violation of their 14th Amendment Rights because their school lunch stinks		Federal
Canada sues the United States for not buying enough maple syrup pursuant to a treaty.		State
A father wants to adjust his parenting time with his children.		State
A tech company in California goes broke and wants to file for bankruptcy.		Federal
Two neighbors fight over where a new fence can be put up.		Concurrent

Chapter 3 Test cloned 12/15/2022

Chapter 3 Test cloned 12/15/2022

Attorneys are permitted to conduct __________________ of potential jurors, the process of asking questions to discover potential biases and mindset.A los abogados se les permite llevar a cabo _______________________

The authority to hear a case first, usually the trial court, is called _______________ jurisdiction.La autoridad para escuchar un caso primero, generalmente el tribunal de primera instancia, se llama jurisdicción ___________________________

Match the US Court to the correct level.Haga coincidir la Corte de los Estados Unidos con el nivel correcto.

Match the NJ Court to the correct level

Move each case to the court with the proper jurisdiction (State or Federal). Use the chart above to assist.

Describe concepts of Precedent and Stare Decisis and why they are important to the US legal system.Describir los conceptos de Precedent y Stare Decisis y por qué son importantes para el sistema legal de los Estados Unidos.

IRAC - ResponseWhat was the issue in Plessy v. Fergusson?

IRAC - Response* Issue:

b. What are the strongest arguments that there was no need to give Alvarado Miranda warnings in these circumstances?B. ¿Cuáles son los argumentos más fuertes de que no hubo necesidad de dar advertencias a Alvarado Miranda en estas circunstancias?

d. Should Alvarado have done anything differently? Should the detective have done anything differently?d. ¿Debería Alvarado haber hecho algo diferente? ¿Debería el detective haber hecho algo diferente?

Attorneys are permitted to conduct __________________ of potential jurors, the process of asking questions to discover potential biases and mindset.A los abogados se les permite llevar a cabo _______________________

The authority to hear a case first, usually the trial court, is called _______________ jurisdiction.La autoridad para escuchar un caso primero, generalmente el tribunal de primera instancia, se llama jurisdicción ___________________________

Match the US Court to the correct level.Haga coincidir la Corte de los Estados Unidos con el nivel correcto.

Match the NJ Court to the correct level

Move each case to the court with the proper jurisdiction (State or Federal). Use the chart above to assist.

Describe concepts of Precedent and Stare Decisis and why they are important to the US legal system.Describir los conceptos de Precedent y Stare Decisis y por qué son importantes para el sistema legal de los Estados Unidos.

IRAC - ResponseWhat was the issue in Plessy v. Fergusson?

Analysis: How did the SCOTUS apply the rule to the law? What test did they create?

Conclusion: What did the SCOTUS decide?

IRAC - Response* Issue:

Analysis:

Conclusion:

b. What are the strongest arguments that there was no need to give Alvarado Miranda warnings in these circumstances?B. ¿Cuáles son los argumentos más fuertes de que no hubo necesidad de dar advertencias a Alvarado Miranda en estas circunstancias?

d. Should Alvarado have done anything differently? Should the detective have done anything differently?d. ¿Debería Alvarado haber hecho algo diferente? ¿Debería el detective haber hecho algo diferente?

Analysis: How did the SCOTUS apply the rule to the law? What test did they create?

Conclusion: What did the SCOTUS decide?

Conclusion:

Attorneys are permitted to conduct of potential jurors, the process of asking questions to discover potential biases and mindset.

A los abogados se les permite llevar a cabo _____

The authority to hear a case first, usually the trial court, is called _ jurisdiction.

La autoridad para escuchar un caso primero, generalmente el tribunal de primera instancia, se llama jurisdicción _____________

Match the US Court to the correct level.

Haga coincidir la Corte de los Estados Unidos con el nivel correcto.

Describe concepts of Precedent and Stare Decisis and why they are important to the US legal system.

Describir los conceptos de Precedent y Stare Decisis y por qué son importantes para el sistema legal de los Estados Unidos.

IRAC - Response

What was the issue in Plessy v. Fergusson?

IRAC - Response

* Issue:

b. What are the strongest arguments that there was no need to give Alvarado Miranda warnings in these circumstances?

B. ¿Cuáles son los argumentos más fuertes de que no hubo necesidad de dar advertencias a Alvarado Miranda en estas circunstancias?

d. Should Alvarado have done anything differently? Should the detective have done anything differently?

d. ¿Debería Alvarado haber hecho algo diferente? ¿Debería el detective haber hecho algo diferente?

Attorneys are permitted to conduct of potential jurors, the process of asking questions to discover potential biases and mindset.

A los abogados se les permite llevar a cabo _____

The authority to hear a case first, usually the trial court, is called _ jurisdiction.

La autoridad para escuchar un caso primero, generalmente el tribunal de primera instancia, se llama jurisdicción _____________

Match the US Court to the correct level.

Haga coincidir la Corte de los Estados Unidos con el nivel correcto.

Describe concepts of Precedent and Stare Decisis and why they are important to the US legal system.

Describir los conceptos de Precedent y Stare Decisis y por qué son importantes para el sistema legal de los Estados Unidos.

IRAC - Response

What was the issue in Plessy v. Fergusson?

IRAC - Response

* Issue:

b. What are the strongest arguments that there was no need to give Alvarado Miranda warnings in these circumstances?

B. ¿Cuáles son los argumentos más fuertes de que no hubo necesidad de dar advertencias a Alvarado Miranda en estas circunstancias?

d. Should Alvarado have done anything differently? Should the detective have done anything differently?

d. ¿Debería Alvarado haber hecho algo diferente? ¿Debería el detective haber hecho algo diferente?