Log in
Sign up for FREE
arrow_back
Library

Unit 1"My Perspectives" Argument Pre-assessment

star
star
star
star
star
Last updated almost 3 years ago
8 questions
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Directions: carefully read the informational text below. Then, answer the questions that follow by choosing the BEST answer.
Question 1
1.

Question 2
2.

Question 3
3.

Question 4
4.

Question 5
5.

Question 6
6.

Question 7
7.

Question 8
8.

Opinion: Lower the voting age to 16 for federal elections?
by USA Today Roundup, USA TODAY on 04.17.19

In the 1960s, the country asked itself that if young men can die in Vietnam, then shouldn't they be trusted with the right to vote? Similarly, now, we must ask ourselves that if 16- and 17-year-olds can contribute to society through work, and face the criminal justice system as adults, isn't it only reasonable to allow them the right of self-determination through voting?

In these teen years, many individuals begin to work and pay taxes. This is also when we grant the right to drive a car. On the flip side, about 250,000 youth are tried, sentenced or incarcerated as adults every year across the U.S. When they're contributing to society or being held liable by society in these ways, they should also be able to weigh in on the future of our country and those responsible for the laws that affect them.

That's why it was great to see freshman Representative Joe Neguse, a Democrat from Colorado, lead an effort that allows 16- and 17-year-olds to preregister to vote ahead of their 18th birthday. This policy has already worked in many states: 14 states (and Washington, D.C.) already allow teenagers to preregister to vote at 16, and nine allow it for 17-year-olds.

In California alone, since 2016, more than 200,000 teenagers preregistered before their 18th birthdays.

Congress only has the authority to lower the voting age for federal elections. That's what sparked the 26th Amendment, which in 1971 lowered the voting age in every election to 18.

Freshman Representative Ayanna Pressley, a Democrat from Massachusetts, proposed lowering the voting age from 18 to 16 for federal elections. The proposal failed with only 126 votes but represented a turning point in the fight for enfranchisement. It had the support of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who has championed such efforts at the local level in California for years.

Because voter turnout is habitual, it seems like a no-brainer to let people start voting at a younger age. If 16- and 17-year-olds can go to the polls with their parents or other adult figures, it could begin a lifetime of such civic engagement.

Lowering the voting age is a worthy endeavor. Let's do it.

_David de la Fuente is a political analyst at Third Way, a center-left think tank._

_The opinions expressed in this text are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Newsela._

What Others Are Saying:

Teens Are Unreliable

Teens more often rely on the amygdala, the more emotional, primitive part of the brain. It isn't from gratuitous animus that car-rental agencies make it difficult for young drivers to rent a vehicle. Or that the Constitution establishes 25 as the minimum age to be a member of Congress. Of course, another reason that 16-year-olds are subject to so many restrictions that don't apply to grown-ups is that they don't know anything — or in any case, they don't know enough to be trusted to make sound decisions about liquor, firearms, joining the Marines and governing the United States. The ignorance of teens is practically a cliché.

_Jeff Jacoby is a politically conservative columnist for the Boston Globe._

_The opinions expressed in this text are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Newsela._

Teens Don't Make Bad Choices Any More Than Adults Do

Cold cognitive abilities are those we use when we are in a calm situation, when we are by ourselves and have time to deliberate and when the most important skill is the ability to reason logically with facts. Voting is a good example of this sort of situation. Studies of cold cognition have shown that the skills necessary to make informed decisions are firmly in place by 16. By that age, adolescents can gather and process information, weigh pros and cons, reason logically with facts and take time before making a decision. Teenagers may sometimes make bad choices, but statistically speaking, they do not make them any more often than adults do.
_Laurence Steinberg is a professor of psychology at Temple University and a contributor to The New York Times._

_The opinions expressed in this text are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Newsela._

Young Voters Can Establish Patterns For A Lifetime

In (America) people start voting at 18. That's the year that they often move off to college. They either have to cast ballots in a community with which they're unfamiliar, or pay attention to elections in a place where they no longer reside. That's a recipe for indifference. It would be much easier to encourage people to vote for the first time, and to establish voting patterns for a lifetime, when they're 16 and in high school. One objection is that young people will just vote like their parents. But researchers have found that people are always influenced by those close to them. People of all ages vote like their parents, or like their spouses or like their neighbors.

_Noah Berlatsky is a writer and editor who writes about gender and culture._

_The opinions expressed in this text are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Newsela._
What is the overall main claim of the article?
A. There are pros and cons to lowering the voting age.
B. The voting age should be lowered to 16.
C. He is defending the current voting age of 18.
D. He believes the voting age should be raised.
Read the following sentences from paragraph 2 of the article:

“In these teen years, many individuals begin to work and pay taxes. This is also when we grant the right to drive a car.”

How do these sentences develop a key argument of the author, de la Fuentes?
A. By describing reasons why the voting age was lowered in 1971
B. By questioning the criminal justice system policies that allow teenagers to be tried as adults
C. By highlighting responsibilities that teenagers often have before they are allowed to vote
D. By providing examples of rights for which lawmakers are considering changing the age of requirements
Which piece of evidence from the article conflicts with de la Fuente’s point of view?
A. Of course, another reason that 16-year-olds are subject to so many restrictions that don’t apply to grown ups is that they don’t know anything– or in any case, they don’t know enough to be trusted to make sound decisions about liquor, firearms, joining the Marines and governing the United States.
B. By that age, adolescents can gather and process information, weigh pros and cons, reason logically with facts and take time before making a decision.
C. It would be much easier to to encourage people to vote for the first time, and to establish voting patterns for a lifetime, when they’re 16 and in high school.
D. One objection is that young people will just vote like their parents. But researchers have found that people are always influenced by those close to them. People of all ages vote like their parents, or their spouses or like their neighbors.
What is the counterclaim offered in the article?
A. Teenagers are too emotional
B. The Constitution establishes a minimum age for holding office
C. There are many other areas where teenagers are not able to do things due to age
D. Teenagers are unreliable
What is the MOST LIKELY reason Jeff Jacoby includes the information about the amygdala in section 2 of the article?
A. To provide a reason why teenagers should be trusted to engage in civic duties
B. To provide an example of a situation in which teenagers commonly make poor decisions
C. To support the argument that teenagers’ brains are just as developed as adults’ brains
D. To support the argument that teenagers are not old enough to make reasonable choices
How does the phrase “if young men can die in Vietnam, then shouldn’t they be trusted with the right to vote?” (paragraph 1) strengthen the main argument?
A. It creates an ethical appeal (ethos) because the Vietnam war was important in U.S. history
B. It creates a logical appeal (logos) based on facts
C. It creates a timely appeal (kairos) to connect past to present
D. It creates an emotional appeal (pathos) to influence readers
Which of the following TWO excerpts are examples of the author’s reasoning in support of their claim?
A. “In California alone, since 2016, more than 200,000 teenagers pre-registered before their 18th birthdays.”
B. “Because voter turnout is habitual, it seems like a no-brainer to let people start voting at a younger age. If 16 and 17-year-olds can go to the polls with their parents or other adult figures, it could begin a lifetime of such civic engagement.”
C. “It would be much easier to encourage people to vote for the first time, and to establish voting patterns for a lifetime, when they’re 16 and in high school.”
D. “Congress only has the authority to lower the voting age for federal elections. That’s what sparked the 26th amendment, which in 1971 lowered the voting age in every election to 18.”
The author of this argument does not have a thesis statement. What should the thesis statement be for this argument?
A. In the United States, the voting age should be lowered to 16 so young people can vote since they can drive a car legally.
B. In the United States, the voting age should be lowered to16 to have access to privileges of an adult since they are expected to have adult responsibilities.
C. In the United States, the voting age should be lowered to 16 since students and young adults work and pay taxes.
D. In the United States, the voting age should be lowered to 16 to ensure a reliable and experienced teenager has a voice in the country in which they reside.