Counter Arguments

Last updated about 2 years ago

5 questions

Required

1

Required

1

Required

1

Required

1

Required

1

Library

Counter Arguments

Last updated about 2 years ago

5 questions

Required

1

Required

1

Required

1

If you believe that their shouldn't be a dress code. what would the counter argument be?

Required

1

Required

1

Draggable item		Corresponding Item

"I would argue that, for the moment, robotic exploration should have the upper hand."

Which quotation from “Machines, Not People, Should be Exploring the Stars for Now” directly challenges that idea?

People are fragile. They need food, water, and air. They can exist in only a narrow range of temperatures and find inhospitable both vacuums and a radioactive environment. 

Proponents of the astronaut-preferred camp point, quite rightfully, at the versatility and independence of humans. Fans of human spaceflight are certainly correct when they remind us that humans are highly versatile. People observe the conditions around them and can react to circumstances as needed. 

Possible manned missions to Mars are imagined to cost about $1 trillion, with the outcome being limited exploration of the Red Planet by about 2030 (with some estimates saying 2050). And a mission with that price tag would hamstring the rest of the space program. 

There are three important goals we need to achieve from our space program. The first is monitoring our own world, resulting in storm warnings and help in understanding our complex planet, which can best be done by tireless satellites orbiting the Earth. The second is to learn more about our solar system and the more distant universe. On this, the case is also clear: robotic exploration, through either space probes or telescopes, provides a much better yield for much lower money. 

Which is NOT a counter argument for Don Lincoln's claim that machines, not people, should be exploring the stars for now?

Manned missions help the U.S. keep its status as a global superpower.

Manned missons lead to innovations that make money for the U.S. economy 

Manned missions inspire people to join the sciences 

Machine missions are less expensive.

If you believe that their shouldn't be a dress code. what would the counter argument be?

What counter argument does Don Lincoln address in his editorial?

Manned space travel inspires people

Humans are versitile. 

Manned space travel helps the U.S. stay a global super power.

Innovations to get people in space help the economy 

Match the argument and counter argument

Draggable item		Corresponding Item
Video games are harmful to child development		People should buy pets from breeders
Football is too dangerous for adolescents		Students shouldn't have a dress code
People should buy pets from a shelter		Football creates a social activity for young people
Students should wear uniforms		Adding more classes to a school is too expensive and creates scheduling issues
Life skills classes should be included in schools		Video games create a social space for children if they can't visit their friends due to rules or distance

"I would argue that, for the moment, robotic exploration should have the upper hand."

Which quotation from “Machines, Not People, Should be Exploring the Stars for Now” directly challenges that idea?

People are fragile. They need food, water, and air. They can exist in only a narrow range of temperatures and find inhospitable both vacuums and a radioactive environment. 

Proponents of the astronaut-preferred camp point, quite rightfully, at the versatility and independence of humans. Fans of human spaceflight are certainly correct when they remind us that humans are highly versatile. People observe the conditions around them and can react to circumstances as needed. 

Possible manned missions to Mars are imagined to cost about $1 trillion, with the outcome being limited exploration of the Red Planet by about 2030 (with some estimates saying 2050). And a mission with that price tag would hamstring the rest of the space program. 

There are three important goals we need to achieve from our space program. The first is monitoring our own world, resulting in storm warnings and help in understanding our complex planet, which can best be done by tireless satellites orbiting the Earth. The second is to learn more about our solar system and the more distant universe. On this, the case is also clear: robotic exploration, through either space probes or telescopes, provides a much better yield for much lower money. 

Which is NOT a counter argument for Don Lincoln's claim that machines, not people, should be exploring the stars for now?

Manned missions help the U.S. keep its status as a global superpower.

Manned missons lead to innovations that make money for the U.S. economy 

Manned missions inspire people to join the sciences 

Machine missions are less expensive.

What counter argument does Don Lincoln address in his editorial?

Manned space travel inspires people

Humans are versitile. 

Manned space travel helps the U.S. stay a global super power.

Innovations to get people in space help the economy 

Match the argument and counter argument 

Video games are harmful to child development 

People should buy pets from breeders 

Football is too dangerous for adolescents 

Students shouldn't have a dress code

People should buy pets from a shelter 

Football creates a social activity for young people

Students should wear uniforms 

Adding more classes to a school is too expensive and creates scheduling issues

Life skills classes should be included in schools

Video games create a social space for children if they can't visit their friends due to rules or distance 

Counter Arguments

Counter Arguments

If you believe that their shouldn't be a dress code. what would the counter argument be?

"I would argue that, for the moment, robotic exploration should have the upper hand."Which quotation from “Machines, Not People, Should be Exploring the Stars for Now” directly challenges that idea?

Which is NOT a counter argument for Don Lincoln's claim that machines, not people, should be exploring the stars for now?

If you believe that their shouldn't be a dress code. what would the counter argument be?

What counter argument does Don Lincoln address in his editorial?

Match the argument and counter argument

"I would argue that, for the moment, robotic exploration should have the upper hand."

Which quotation from “Machines, Not People, Should be Exploring the Stars for Now” directly challenges that idea?