Log in
Sign up for FREE
arrow_back
Library

UPDATED 2024 8th Grade ELA Unit 1 Common Assessment: Gadgets and Glitches

star
star
star
star
star
Last updated about 3 hours ago
10 questions
Read the passage and choose the best answer to each question.
Passage 1- "A School for Robots" by Sauro Marianelli
Passage 2
Required
1
RL.8.1
Required
2
RL.8.1
Required
1
RL.8.2
Required
1
RL.8.1
Required
3
RL.8.2
Required
1
RI.8.2
Required
1
RI.8.1
Required
1
RI.8.6
Required
2
RI.8.8
Required
2
RI.8.8
A School for Robots
by Sauro Marianelli
Translated by Edith Calzolari

1 There was once a school without a single living student; the principal got his pupils from a robot factory instead. He boasted that these little robots were quite perfect, technically, and he never missed an opportunity to show how easy it was to make them work. Simply by pressing a row of buttons on their shoulders, beneath their sweaters, one could make them do exactly what was needed. In short, they could be programmed to behave in a certain way and were absolutely guaranteed to work.

2 There was even a metal plate on each one, next to the buttons, which said: Manufactured in accordance with existing laws.

3 You can understand why, in a school devoted to perfect order and regularity, these little programmed robots would be far more convenient than real students. One teacher was enough for everybody. Each morning, all that had to be done was to press the right buttons, and the rest would follow automatically.

4 So these little robots were indeed marvels of mechanical and electronic efficiency, and everyone who saw them working was stunned by their performance.

5 At 8:25, at the sound of the first bell, they would enter the classroom. At 8:30, at the sound of the second bell, they would begin to write down their arithmetic problems or start their compositions. At 9:30, they would all hand in their papers.

6 At 9:35, they would all recite history in exactly the same way: “At the gallows, Nathan Hale said, ‘I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my country.’”

7 At 10:15, they took their lunch trays and they ate. At 10:20, they went to the bathroom. At 10:25, they sat down in their seats again.

8 At 10:30, they all repeated the same rule of grammar together: “The names of persons form the plural in the usual way, by adding s or es, as in the examples—four Toms and two Jameses.”

9 At 11:15, they did arithmetic. At 12:00, they recited geography from the textbook: “Florida is a state known for sun, flowers, and beautiful beaches.”

10 At 12:45, they packed up their schoolbags. At 12:50, they said good-bye to the teacher and left.

11 The following day, the program repeated what had been studied previously. Of course, it was possible to switch subjects around somewhat to take arithmetic before history, or, in place of one rule of grammar, to take another. But these were small changes that didn’t really matter, so nothing ever really happened to disrupt the regularity of the lessons. The robots always behaved just as the teacher had programmed them. Indeed, the principal was so content with this state of affairs that he not only praised the teacher highly, but even gave her a promotion.

12 Now, one morning, a new robot came to school, looking exactly like all the rest. However, at 8:30, at the sound of the second bell, when it was time for them all to be seated, the newcomer dawdled a bit, just enough to surprise and alarm the teacher, who from that moment on kept a sharp eye on it.

13 But there was an even greater surprise at 9:35, during the history lesson. The new robot recited: “At the gallows, Nathan Hale said, ‘Hats off!’”

14 The teacher was so dumbfounded that she went to examine the robot’s buttons at once, to see whether she might have pressed them incorrectly. Indeed not. All the buttons were in place. The teacher couldn’t imagine such a disrespectful version of history being recited in school. She went back to her desk, full of anxiety, hoping that the principal would not find out.

15 At 10:15, when the other robots took their lunches from their schoolbags, the newcomer got up and went to the bathroom. When the others went to the bathroom, it began to eat lunch.

16 Perhaps a button is stuck, thought the teacher, as she went to take another look. No! Even the buttons for recess were in place. Why was it that this one robot, just the same as all the others, didn’t behave in the same way?

17 At 10:30, when they all repeated the rule for forming the plural of names, the new robot said: “If I followed the rule and added es, would I say ‘My two Aunt Besseses?’”

18 Then the teacher telephoned frantically to the factory to send a repairman at once. She was even willing to pay from her own pocket.

19 When the repairman arrived, he checked all the buttons, and since they were in order, he couldn’t find anything to do except to tighten some screws and say, “Everything is fine.” The teacher, greatly relieved, beamed with pleasure.

20 But at 11:15, when all the others were reciting their numbers in perfect sequence, the newcomer counted: “Seven, five, three, four, ten . . .”

21 In despair, the teacher said, “Don’t you see how it is mixing them up? Do something, quickly!”

22 “There must be a bad connection somewhere,” said the repairman, pulling an oil can from his bag. “Now you’ll see that everything will be all right.”

23 But at 12:00, when the others were reciting geography, exactly in the way they were supposed to do, the new robot began to ask questions instead. “Why is it that in Florida the sun is gray? Why are the flowers there black? Why is the beach made of asphalt? Why—” And who knows what else it might have asked if the teacher hadn’t clapped her hands over its mouth at this moment to stop it.

24 Nevertheless, the principal heard all the commotion and came running. The teacher, unfortunately, then had to explain.

25 The principal turned to the repairman and said, “Isn’t there some way to find out why this one doesn’t work like the others?”

26 “There must be something inside that doesn’t work,” he replied. “I’d have to take it apart and look inside. Perhaps something’s worn-out.”

27 “There must be something worn-out. Take it apart and fix it at once,” said the principal.

28 So the repairman quickly took his screwdriver and began to loosen all the little screws on the outside. When he had unfastened everything and was able to take off the cover, he just stood there, with his eyes wide open. There, inside, instead of the spools of magnetic tape that the other robots had, was a live little boy, and he was just looking at them and laughing.
Question 1
1.

This question has two parts. First, answer Part A. Then, answer Part B.

Part A In paragraph 11, what can the reader infer based on the promotion given to the teacher?

Question 2
2.

Part B Which two excerpts best support the answer to Part A?

Question 3
3.

This question has two parts. First, answer Part A. Then, answer Part B.

Part A What theme is suggested by the way the teacher responds to the new robot’s behavior?

Question 4
4.

Part B
Which quotation from the story best supports the answer to Part A?

Question 5
5.

One possible theme is: The goal of achieving perfection can present challenges.

How is the theme of the story developed? Use text evidence to support your response.

Do You Want a Robot Companion When You Get Old?
by Kathryn Hulick

1 A robot in the shape of a fuzzy baby seal sat on 73-year-old Lois Simmeth’s lap. “I know you’re not real,” she whispered. “But somehow, I don’t know, I love you.” The robot, named Paro, couldn’t answer. But it could make cute mewling sounds, move its head, and blink its large, adorable eyes. Interactions such as this one are happening at some nursing homes and other eldercare facilities around the world. Supporters say that Paro and similar robots provide the same kind of comfort to elderly people as animal therapy, without the risk of allergies or the dangers of handling real cats and dogs. Opponents worry that cuddly robots will unfairly lead people with dementia1 to care for uncaring machines.

2 Which side is right? Research has shown that Paro can have the same calming effect as medications on agitated dementia patients. Yet Paro has none of the physical side effects of medication. Plus, when it comes to providing companionship and comfort to the elderly, there just aren’t enough people to go around. Being a caregiver is a tough job that often doesn’t pay well. A robot companion may be better than none at all.

3 Takanori Shibata is the Japanese inventor who created Paro. In a video for the Financial Times, he said, “I made Paro like a human baby’s size. Paro is a robot but people feel that Paro is a living animal or baby.” Shibata clearly thinks that a robot baby is a good thing, but others aren’t so sure.

4 Sherry Turkle, a social scientist at MIT, regularly speaks out about the downsides of technology. She witnessed an elderly woman talking to Paro as if the seal were real, and the experience troubled her. In a TED talk, she said: “That woman was trying to make sense of her life with a machine that had no experience of the arc of a human life.” Turkle is concerned that we are starting to expect more from technology and less from each other. She feels that technology can never replace a real-life relationship with another person.

5 What do you think? Is Paro a sign that humans are losing touch with each other, or that we’re finding new ways to feel connected? Would you want a robot companion when you get old?

1dementia:loss of cognitive abilities, including memory, concentration, communication, planning, and abstract thinking, resulting from brain injury or from a disease such as Alzheimer’s disease or Parkinson’s disease
Question 6
6.

This question has two parts. First, answer Part A. Then, answer Part B.

Part A What is the main idea of Passage 2?

Question 7
7.

Part B
Which selection from Passage 2 best supports the answer to Part A?

Question 8
8.

Why does the author include the information in passage 2, paragraph 1?

Question 9
9.

Which two statements from Passage 2 support the claim that robot pets make good companions?

Question 10
10.

Which two details from Passage 2 best support the argument of people who oppose using robots like Paro?

There was once a school without a single living student; the principal got his pupils from a robot factory instead.(paragraph 1)
Indeed, the principal was so content with this state of affairs that he not only praised the teacher highly, but even gave her a promotion. (paragraph 11)
Of course, it was possible to switch subjects around somewhat to take arithmetic before history, or, in place of one rule of grammar, to take another. (paragraph 11)
So these little robots were indeed marvels of mechanical and electronic efficiency, and everyone who saw them working was stunned by their performance. (paragraph 4)
Then the teacher telephoned frantically to the factory to send a repairman at once. She was even willing to pay from her own pocket. (paragraph 18)
Being a caregiver is a tough job that often doesn't pay well. (paragraph 2)
"She witnessed an elderly woman talking to Paro as if the seal were real, and the experiences troubled her." (paragraph 4)
Yet Paro has none of the physical side effects of medication. (paragraph 2)
"Paro is a robot but people feel that Paro is a living animal or baby. (paragraph 3)
It can be confusing for dementia patients who may think the robot is a living thing.