Log in
Sign up for FREE
arrow_back
Library

Study: 'High Incomes Don't Bring You Happiness'

star
star
star
star
star
Last updated 23 days ago
6 questions
5
5
5
5
5
5
1 How much money do you think it would take to make you happy? Would an extra $10,000 a year do it or would it take a $100,000 salary bump to improve your mood?
A new study from Princeton economist Angus Deaton and psychologist Daniel Kahneman suggests that number depends on how you define happiness. The authors draw a distinction between emotional well-being, “the quality of a person’s everyday experience such as joy, fascination, anxiety, sadness, anger, and affection,” and life evaluation, “a person’s thoughts about his or her life (on a longer time scale).”
3 Their study of data from the Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index found that while “life evaluations rise steadily with income,” emotional well-being drops off at about $75,000 a year.
Beyond $75,000, money is important for life evaluation but does nothing for happiness, enjoyment, sadness, or stress. Both factors are important; it is good to have high emotional well-being, but it is also good to think your life is going well.
5 According to the most recent census data, the median U.S. household income was $52,000 in 2008, with about a third of households making above $75,000
Question 1
1.

Question 2
2.

Question 3
3.

Question 4
4.

Question 5
5.

Question 6
6.

Which statement best describes the author's likely purpose for proposing questions in paragraph 1?
to show that money is the most important factor in happiness
to prompt readers to consider how money affects their happiness
to prompt readers to imagine what they would do with extra cash
to show that experts are unsure how money affects one's happiness
After reading the article, the author used the persuasion technique of...
Ethos, the author uses the economist as an image of what "emotional well being" appears to persuade you on the topic.
Logos, the author uses facts and monetary values to persuade you on the topic.
Pathos, the author uses the emotion on how people feel about their life to persuade you on the topic.
Rhetorical question, the author asks questions in the article to persuade you on the topic.
PART A: What statement best identifies the central idea of the text?
Money makes people happy above anything else.
Emotional well-being is solely dependent on wealth.
Money plays a limited role in people's overall happiness.
Money plays no role in people's overall happiness.
PART B: Which detail from the text best supports the answer to Part A?
"would it take a $100,000 salary bump to improve your mood?" (Paragraph 1)
"Beyond $75,000, money is important for life evaluation but does nothing for happiness" (Paragraph 4)
"it is good to have high emotional well-being, but it is also good to think your life is going well." (Paragraph 4)
"the median U.S. household income was $52,000 in 2008, with about a third of households making above $75,000." (Paragraph 5)
Which statement best expresses the counterclaim of the article?
Beyond $75,000, money is important for life evaluation but does nothing for happiness, enjoyment, sadness, or stress.
Both factors are important; it is good to have high emotional well-being, but it is also good to think your life is going well.
A new study from Princeton economist Angus Deaton and psychologist Daniel Kahneman suggests that number depends on how you define happiness.
Their study of data from the Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index found that while “life evaluations rise steadily with income,” emotional well-being drops off at about $75,000 a year.
Which word would be a more precise word to use than "Emotional Well Being"? in the sentence in paragraph 4?
Safety
Security
Welfare
Dissatisfaction