NYSED High School Regents English
star
star
star
star
star
Last updated 7 months ago
26 questions
Reading Comprehension Passage A
The Great Silence
In this work of fiction, the narrator is a parrot who reveals its view of human attempts to communicate with intelligent species in outer space.
1 The humans use Arecibo1 to look for extraterrestrial intelligence. Their desire to make a connection is so strong that they’ve created an ear capable of hearing across the universe.
But I and my fellow parrots are right here. Why aren’t they interested in listening to our voices?
We’re a nonhuman species capable of communicating with them. Aren’t we exactly what humans are looking for?
4 The universe is so vast that intelligent life must surely have arisen many times. The universe is also so old that even one technological species would have had time to expand and fill the galaxy. Yet there is no sign of life anywhere except on Earth. Humans call this the Fermi Paradox.
One proposed solution to the Fermi Paradox is that intelligent species actively try to conceal their presence, to avoid being targeted by hostile invaders.
Speaking as a member of a species that has been driven nearly to extinction by humans, I can attest that this is a wise strategy.
It makes sense to remain quiet and avoid attracting attention.
8 The Fermi Paradox is sometimes known as the Great Silence. The universe ought to be a cacophony2 of voices, but instead it is disconcertingly quiet.
Some humans theorize that intelligent species go extinct before they can expand into outer space. If they’re correct, then the hush of the night sky is the silence of a graveyard.
Hundreds of years ago, my kind was so plentiful that the Rio Abajo Forest [Puerto Rico] resounded with our voices. Now we’re almost gone. Soon this rain forest may be as silent as the rest of the universe.
11 There was an African gray parrot named Alex. He was famous for his cognitive abilities. Famous among humans, that is.
A human researcher named Irene Pepperberg spent thirty years studying Alex. She found that not only did Alex know the words for shapes and colors, he actually understood the concepts of shape and color.
Many scientists were skeptical that a bird could grasp abstract concepts. Humans like to think they’re unique. But eventually Pepperberg convinced them that Alex wasn’t just repeating words, that he understood what he was saying.
14 Out of all my cousins, Alex was the one who came closest to being taken seriously as a communication partner by humans.
Alex died suddenly, when he was still relatively young. The evening before he died, Alex said to Pepperberg, “You be good. I love you.”
If humans are looking for a connection with a nonhuman intelligence, what more can they ask for than that?
17 Every parrot has a unique call that it uses to identify itself; biologists refer to this as the parrot’s “contact call.”
In 1974, astronomers used Arecibo to broadcast a message into outer space intended to demonstrate human intelligence. That was humanity’s contact call.
In the wild, parrots address each other by name. One bird imitates another’s contact call to get the other bird’s attention.
If humans ever detect the Arecibo message being sent back to Earth, they will know someone is trying to get their attention.
21 Parrots are vocal learners: we can learn to make new sounds after we’ve heard them. It’s an ability that few animals possess. A dog may understand dozens of commands, but it will never do anything but bark.
Humans are vocal learners, too. We have that in common. So humans and parrots share a special relationship with sound. We don’t simply cry out. We pronounce. We enunciate.
Perhaps that’s why humans built Arecibo the way they did. A receiver doesn’t have to be a transmitter, but Arecibo is both. It’s an ear for listening, and a mouth for speaking.
24 Humans have lived alongside parrots for thousands of years, and only recently have they considered the possibility that we might be intelligent.
I suppose I can’t blame them. We parrots used to think humans weren’t very bright. It’s hard to make sense of behavior that’s so different from your own.
But parrots are more similar to humans than any extraterrestrial species will be, and humans can observe us up close; they can look us in the eye. How do they expect to recognize an alien intelligence if all they can do is eavesdrop from a hundred light-years away?
27 It’s no coincidence that “aspiration” means both hope and the act of breathing.
When we speak, we use breath in our lungs to give our thoughts a physical form. The sounds we make are simultaneously our intentions and our life force.
I speak, therefore I am. Vocal learners, like parrots and humans, are perhaps the only ones who fully comprehend the truth of this.
30 There’s a pleasure that comes with shaping sounds with your mouth. It’s so primal and visceral3 that, throughout their history, humans have considered the activity a pathway to the divine.
Pythagorean mystics4 believed that vowels represented the music of the spheres, and chanted to draw power from them.
Pentecostal Christians believe that when they speak in tongues, they’re speaking the language used by angels in heaven.
Brahman Hindus believe that by reciting mantras, they are strengthening the building blocks of reality.
Only a species of vocal learners would ascribe5 such importance to sound in their mythologies. We parrots can appreciate that.
35 According to Hindu mythology, the universe was created with a sound: “om.” It is a syllable that contains within it everything that ever was and everything that will be.
When the Arecibo telescope is pointed at the space between stars, it hears a faint hum.
Astronomers call that the cosmic microwave background. It’s the residual6 radiation of the Big Bang, the explosion that created the universe fourteen billion years ago.
But you can also think of it as a barely audible reverberation7 of that original “om.” That syllable was so resonant that the night sky will keep vibrating for as long as the universe exists.
When Arecibo is not listening to anything else, it hears the voice of creation.
40 We Puerto Rican parrots have our own myths. They’re simpler than human mythology, but I think humans would take pleasure from them.
Alas, our myths are being lost as my species dies out. I doubt the humans will have deciphered our language before we’re gone.
So the extinction of my species doesn’t just mean the loss of a group of birds. It’s also the disappearance of our language, our rituals, our traditions. It’s the silencing of our voice.
43 Human activity has brought my kind to the brink of extinction, but I don’t blame them for it. They didn’t do it maliciously. They just weren’t paying attention.
And humans create such beautiful myths; what imaginations they have. Perhaps that’s why their aspirations are so immense. Look at Arecibo. Any species who can build such a thing must have greatness within them.
My species probably won’t be here for much longer; it’s likely that we’ll die before our time and join the Great Silence. But before we go, we are sending a message to humanity. We just hope the telescope at Arecibo will enable them to hear it.
The message is this:
You be good. I love you.
—Ted Chiang
adapted from “The Great Silence”
Exhalation, 2019
Alfred A. Knopf
_____________________
1Arecibo — a former space observatory located in Arecibo, Puerto Rico
2cacophony — a jarring mixture of noises
3visceral — instinctive
4Pythagorean mystics — ancient Greek believers
5ascribe — credit
6residual — remaining
7reverberation — echo
Required
1
The Fermi Paradox (paragraph 4) explains why
The Fermi Paradox (paragraph 4) explains why
Required
1
The figurative language in paragraph 9 suggests that intelligent extraterrestrials
The figurative language in paragraph 9 suggests that intelligent extraterrestrials
Required
1
Alex’s death (paragraph 15) is expressed using which literary device?
Alex’s death (paragraph 15) is expressed using which literary device?
Required
1
Paragraphs 18 through 20 suggest that extraterrestrials may
Paragraphs 18 through 20 suggest that extraterrestrials may
Required
1
In paragraph 30, the word “primal” most nearly means
In paragraph 30, the word “primal” most nearly means
Required
1
Paragraphs 31 through 35 serve to show the historical
Paragraphs 31 through 35 serve to show the historical
Required
1
As used in paragraph 38, “resonant” most nearly means
As used in paragraph 38, “resonant” most nearly means
Required
1
According to the narrator, “the voice of creation” (paragraph 39) is the result of
According to the narrator, “the voice of creation” (paragraph 39) is the result of
Required
1
Which statement best represents a central idea of the text?
Which statement best represents a central idea of the text?
Reading Comprehension Passage B
Sea Drift
1 They would sit, two or three of them as a rule, on the cast-iron seat they called a form, that stood at the end of the road to the sea where it petered out in a dirt track through salt marsh, disappeared in sand.
2 Old men now: dark clothes and rough workboots worn from habit, faces scarred by wind and sun from days on the boats.
3 Stranded somehow in this place as if, like seaweed, they had washed up on shore at high tide.
4 Survivors from a world once theirs.
5 Somewhere in nearby stone cottages, with modern extensions at the back and sides to accommodate indoor plumbing, were daughters or daughters-in-law, keeping house, cooking meals, expecting the men home, at appointed times.
6 This was the daily routine now.
7 Out of doors they were free, to rejoice in weather and tides, smell sea air that was the smell of life: salt, seaweed, sour mud, dead fish, churned-up sand; to feel the whip of wind on their skin.
8 Gulls circling and swooping in the wide skies, diving, as they once did above the shrimp boats as heavy nets were cast into the sea.
9 The slow pace of nature’s change gave them some kind of peace.
—Eileen Berry
“Sea Drift”
from Bye Bye Blackbird: Worlds Past and Worlds Away, 2010
Plain View Press
Required
1
The term “petered out” in sentence 1 most nearly means
The term “petered out” in sentence 1 most nearly means
Required
1
The figurative language in sentence 3 conveys the men’s
The figurative language in sentence 3 conveys the men’s
Required
1
The men are most likely called “survivors” (sentence 4) because they have
The men are most likely called “survivors” (sentence 4) because they have
Required
1
The repetition of the word “once” in sentences 4 and 8 supports a central idea about
The repetition of the word “once” in sentences 4 and 8 supports a central idea about
Required
1
Which phrase supports a central idea?
Which phrase supports a central idea?
Reading Comprehension Passage C
Beautiful Brains
1 ...The first full series of scans of the developing adolescent brain—a National Institutes of Health (NIH) project that studied over a hundred young people as they grew up during the 1990s—showed that our brains undergo a massive reorganization between our 12th and 25th years. The brain doesn’t actually grow very much during this period. It has already reached 90 percent of its full size by the time a person is six, and a thickening skull accounts for most head growth afterward. But as we move through adolescence, the brain undergoes extensive remodeling, resembling a network and wiring upgrade.
2 For starters, the brain’s axons—the long nerve fibers that neurons use to send signals to other neurons—become gradually more insulated with a fatty substance called myelin (the brain’s white matter), eventually boosting the axons’ transmission speed up to a hundred times. Meanwhile, dendrites, the branchlike extensions that neurons use to receive signals from nearby axons, grow twiggier, and the most heavily used synapses—the little chemical junctures across which axons and dendrites pass notes—grow richer and stronger. At the same time, synapses that see little use begin to wither. This synaptic pruning, as it is called, causes the brain’s cortex—the outer layer of gray matter where we do much of our conscious and complicated thinking—to become thinner but more efficient. Taken together, these changes make the entire brain a much faster and more sophisticated organ.
3 This process of maturation, once thought to be largely finished by elementary school, continues throughout adolescence. Imaging work done since the 1990s shows that these physical changes move in a slow wave from the brain’s rear to its front, from areas close to the brain stem that look after older and more behaviorally basic functions, such as vision, movement, and fundamental processing, to the evolutionarily newer and more complicated thinking areas up front. The corpus callosum, which connects the brain’s left and right hemispheres and carries traffic essential to many advanced brain functions, steadily thickens. Stronger links also develop between the hippocampus, a sort of memory factory, and frontal areas that set goals and weigh different agendas; as a result, we get better at integrating memory and experience into our decisions. At the same time, the frontal areas develop greater speed and richer connections, allowing us to generate and weigh far more variables and agendas than before.
4 When this development proceeds normally, we get better at balancing impulse, desire, goals, self-interest, rules, ethics, and even altruism,1 generating behavior that is more complex and, sometimes at least, more sensible. But at times, and especially at first, the brain does this work clumsily. It’s hard to get all those new cogs to mesh.
5 Beatriz Luna, a University of Pittsburgh professor of psychiatry who uses neuroimaging to study the teen brain, used a simple test that illustrates this learning curve. Luna scanned the brains of children, teens, and twentysomethings while they performed an antisaccade task, a sort of eyes-only video game where you have to stop yourself from looking at a suddenly appearing light. You view a screen on which the red crosshairs at the center occasionally disappear just as a light flickers elsewhere on the screen. Your instructions are to not look at the light and instead to look in the opposite direction. A sensor detects any eye movement. It’s a tough assignment, since flickering lights naturally draw our attention. To succeed, you must override both a normal impulse to attend to new information and curiosity about something forbidden. Brain geeks call this response inhibition.
6 Ten-year-olds stink at it, failing about 45 percent of the time. Teens do much better. In fact, by age 15 they can score as well as adults if they’re motivated, resisting temptation about 70 to 80 percent of the time. What Luna found most interesting, however, was not those scores. It was the brain scans she took while people took the test. Compared with adults, teens tended to make less use of brain regions that monitor performance, spot errors, plan, and stay focused—areas the adults seemed to bring online automatically. This let the adults use a variety of brain resources and better resist temptation, while the teens used those areas less often and more readily gave in to the impulse to look at the flickering light—just as they’re more likely to look away from the road to read a text message.
7 If offered an extra reward, however, teens showed they could push those executive regions to work harder, improving their scores. And by age 20, their brains respond to this task much as the adults do. Luna suspects the improvement comes as richer networks and faster connections make the executive region more effective.
8 These studies help explain why teens behave with such vexing inconsistency: beguiling2 at breakfast, disgusting at dinner; masterful on Monday, sleepwalking on Saturday. Along with lacking experience generally, they’re still learning to use their brain’s new networks. Stress, fatigue, or challenges can cause a misfire. Abigail Baird, a Vassar psychologist who studies teens, calls this neural gawkiness—an equivalent to the physical awkwardness teens sometimes display while mastering their growing bodies.
9 The slow and uneven developmental arc revealed by these imaging studies offers an alluringly pithy3 explanation for why teens may do stupid things like drive at 113 miles an hour, aggrieve their ancientry, and get people (or get gotten) with child: They act that way because their brains aren’t done! You can see it right there in the scans! …
10 Meanwhile, in times of doubt, take inspiration in one last distinction of the teen brain— a final key to both its clumsiness and its remarkable adaptability. This is the prolonged plasticity of those late-developing frontal areas as they slowly mature. As noted earlier, these areas are the last to lay down the fatty myelin insulation—the brain’s white matter—that speeds transmission. And at first glance this seems like bad news: If we need these areas for the complex task of entering the world, why aren’t they running at full speed when the challenges are most daunting?
11 The answer is that speed comes at the price of flexibility. While a myelin coating greatly accelerates an axon ’s bandwidth, it also inhibits the growth of new branches from the axon. According to Douglas Fields, an NIH neuroscientist who has spent years studying myelin, “This makes the period when a brain area lays down myelin a sort of crucial period of learning—the wiring is getting upgraded, but once that’s done it’s harder to change.”
12 The window in which experience can best rewire those connections is highly specific to each brain area. Thus the brain’s language centers acquire their insulation most heavily in the first 13 years, when a child is learning language. The completed insulation consolidates those gains—but makes further gains, such as second languages, far harder to come by.
13 So it is with the forebrain’s myelination during the late teens and early 20s. This delayed completion—a withholding of readiness—heightens flexibility just as we confront and enter the world that we will face as adults.
14 This long, slow, back-to-front developmental wave, completed only in the mid-20s, appears to be a uniquely human adaptation. It may be one of our most consequential. It can seem a bit crazy that we humans don’t wise up a bit earlier in life. But if we smartened up sooner, we’d end up dumber.
—David Dobbs
excerpted from “Beautiful Brains”
National Geographic, October 2011
_____________________
1altruism — concern for others
2beguiling — charming
3pithy — concise
Required
1
The metaphor in paragraph 1 (“But as we … wiring upgrade”) serves to
The metaphor in paragraph 1 (“But as we … wiring upgrade”) serves to
Required
1
The goal of “synaptic pruning” (paragraph 2) is to alter the brain cortex’s
The goal of “synaptic pruning” (paragraph 2) is to alter the brain cortex’s
Required
1
The primary purpose of the first sentence of paragraph 3 is to
The primary purpose of the first sentence of paragraph 3 is to
Required
1
The description of the brain’s development in paragraph 3 implies that as the brain matures,
The description of the brain’s development in paragraph 3 implies that as the brain matures,
Required
1
Paragraph 4 (“When this development … does this work clumsily”) implies that the process of normal maturation is
Paragraph 4 (“When this development … does this work clumsily”) implies that the process of normal maturation is
Required
1
The last sentence of Paragraph 6 contributes to the effectiveness of the text by
The last sentence of Paragraph 6 contributes to the effectiveness of the text by
1
As used in Paragraph 7, the term “executive regions” most likely refers to areas of the brain that
As used in Paragraph 7, the term “executive regions” most likely refers to areas of the brain that
Required
1
As used in the text, the word “plasticity” (paragraph 10) refers to the brain’s
As used in the text, the word “plasticity” (paragraph 10) refers to the brain’s
Required
1
Paragraph 14 provides information that is
Paragraph 14 provides information that is
Required
1
Which statement best identifies the main effect of the myelination process?
Which statement best identifies the main effect of the myelination process?
Required
6
Part 2
Argument
Directions: Closely read each of the four texts provided on pages 12 through 19 and write a source-based argument on the topic below.
Topic: Should people adopt a vegan diet?
Your Task: Carefully read each of the four texts provided. Then, using evidence from at least three of the texts, write a well-developed argument regarding whether or not people should adopt a vegan diet. Clearly establish your claim, distinguish your claim from alternate or opposing claims, and use specific, relevant, and sufficient evidence from at least three of the texts to develop your argument. Do not simply summarize each text.
Guidelines:
Be sure to:- Establish your claim regarding whether or not people should adopt a vegan diet
- Distinguish your claim from alternate or opposing claims
- Use specific, relevant, and sufficient evidence from at least three of the texts to develop your argument
- Identify each source that you reference by text number and line number(s) or graphic (for example: Text 1, line 4 or Text 2, graphic)
- Organize your ideas in a cohesive and coherent manner
- Maintain a formal style of writing
- Follow the conventions of standard written English
Texts:- Text 1 – Pros and Cons of a Vegan Diet
- Text 2 – Are There Health Benefits to Going Vegan?
- Text 3 – Vegan Diets Are Adding to Malnutrition in Wealthy Countries
- Text 4 – Veganism and the Environment
Part 2
Argument
Directions: Closely read each of the four texts provided on pages 12 through 19 and write a source-based argument on the topic below.
Topic: Should people adopt a vegan diet?
Your Task: Carefully read each of the four texts provided. Then, using evidence from at least three of the texts, write a well-developed argument regarding whether or not people should adopt a vegan diet. Clearly establish your claim, distinguish your claim from alternate or opposing claims, and use specific, relevant, and sufficient evidence from at least three of the texts to develop your argument. Do not simply summarize each text.
Guidelines:
Be sure to:
- Establish your claim regarding whether or not people should adopt a vegan diet
- Distinguish your claim from alternate or opposing claims
- Use specific, relevant, and sufficient evidence from at least three of the texts to develop your argument
- Identify each source that you reference by text number and line number(s) or graphic (for example: Text 1, line 4 or Text 2, graphic)
- Organize your ideas in a cohesive and coherent manner
- Maintain a formal style of writing
- Follow the conventions of standard written English
Texts:
- Text 1 – Pros and Cons of a Vegan Diet
- Text 2 – Are There Health Benefits to Going Vegan?
- Text 3 – Vegan Diets Are Adding to Malnutrition in Wealthy Countries
- Text 4 – Veganism and the Environment
Required
4
Part 3
Text-Analysis Response
Your Task: Closely read the text provided and write a well-developed, text-based response of two to three paragraphs. In your response, identify a central idea in the text and analyze how the author’s use of one writing strategy (literary element or literary technique or rhetorical device) develops this central idea. Use strong and thorough evidence from the text to support your analysis. Do not simply summarize the text.
Guidelines:
Be sure to:
- Identify a central idea in the text
- Analyze how the author's use of one writing strategy (literary element or literary technique or rhetorical device) develops this central idea. Examples include: characterization, conflict, denotation/connotation, metaphor, simile, irony, language use, point-of-view, setting, structure, symbolism, theme, tone, etc.
- Use strong and thorough evidence from the text to support your analysis
- Organize your ideas in a cohesive and coherent manner
- Maintain a formal style of writing
- Follow the conventions of standard written English
Part 3
Text-Analysis Response
Your Task: Closely read the text provided and write a well-developed, text-based response of two to three paragraphs. In your response, identify a central idea in the text and analyze how the author’s use of one writing strategy (literary element or literary technique or rhetorical device) develops this central idea. Use strong and thorough evidence from the text to support your analysis. Do not simply summarize the text.
Guidelines:
Be sure to:
- Identify a central idea in the text
- Analyze how the author's use of one writing strategy (literary element or literary technique or rhetorical device) develops this central idea. Examples include: characterization, conflict, denotation/connotation, metaphor, simile, irony, language use, point-of-view, setting, structure, symbolism, theme, tone, etc.
- Use strong and thorough evidence from the text to support your analysis
- Organize your ideas in a cohesive and coherent manner
- Maintain a formal style of writing
- Follow the conventions of standard written English