This formative assesses the understanding of rhetorical strategies and the main arguments presented in the texts "Ban the Ban!" and “Soda’s a Problem but…". The goal is to analyze different perspectives on soda regulations.
The authors of “Ban the Ban!” and “Soda’s a Problem but…” both oppose the soda ban. Explain how each author supports this position using different reasoning or appeals. Use specific evidence from both texts to support your response.
Which statement best compares the arguments of both texts?
How do both authors view Mayor Bloomberg’s soda ban?
What is the author’s purpose in repeating the word “helpless” in “Soda’s a Problem but…”?
Which reasoning does the author use to argue that the soda ban would be ineffective?
Why does the author of “Soda’s a Problem but…” mention exemptions for certain businesses like convenience stores?
In “Soda’s a Problem but…”, how does the author primarily view soda?
Which type of appeal is most strongly used in “Ban the Ban!”?
What does the author of “Ban the Ban!” mean by calling government regulation a “slippery slope”?
Which sentence from "Ban the Ban!" best supports the author’s claim?
What is the central claim of the author in "Ban the Ban!"?