Twa kɔ nsɛm atitiriw so
Log in
Sign up for FREE
arrow_back
Laabri

Designing a Magnetic Locker Key Holder & Retrieval Tool - ES - PS - Forces and Interactions

star
star
star
star
star
Last updated 4 months ago
6 Nsɛmmisa
Hyɛ no nsow a efi ɔkyerɛwfo no hɔ:

Directions: Use the information provided and your knowledge of Physical Science to answer the following questions. Show all work where necessary.

Directions: Use the information provided and your knowledge of Physical Science to answer the following questions. Show all work where necessary.

0
Ɛhia
4
DOK 2
3-PS2-4
Ɛhia
4
DOK 2
3-PS2-4
Ɛhia
6
DOK 3
3-PS2-4
Ɛhia
6
DOK 3
3-PS2-4
Ɛhia
4
DOK 2
3-PS2-4
Ɛhia
8
DOK 4
3-PS2-4

Designing a Magnetic Locker Key Holder & Retrieval Tool

Diagram 1.

Padlock and keys

Real-Life Design Problem

A student frequently drops their metal locker key behind their desk, between bookshelves, or into narrow spaces where fingers cannot reach. The student also often loses track of where the key is placed.

Design Problem for Students

Design a magnetic key holder and retrieval tool that helps the student:

  • Keep the key stored in the same place every day, and

  • Retrieve it from tight spaces using a magnet instead of their hands.

Constraints & Criteria

The design must:

  • Use magnetic forces to hold or retrieve the metal key,

  • Be safe and easy for a 3rd grader to use,

  • Retrieve the key from at least $20\text{ cm}$ away,

  • Prevent the key from falling off during lifting,

  • Store the key visibly so it’s less likely to be lost.

Students will compare different designs to decide which one works best.

Magnets are useful tools that help us move and hold metal objects without needing to touch them directly. Many keychains, tool racks, and storage systems use magnets to prevent items from getting lost. When a magnet is close to a piece of metal, like a locker key, the key becomes attracted to it. The strength of the attraction depends on how strong the magnet is and how far away the key is from the magnet.

To design a magnetic key system, we need to think about two jobs: storage and retrieval. For storage, the magnet should be strong enough to hold the key so it won’t fall off when someone bumps into the desk or opens a locker. For retrieval, the magnet must be at the end of a handle or stick long enough to reach into tight spaces where a hand cannot fit. The magnet also needs to be strong enough to pull the key toward it even when the key is slightly hidden or not directly touching the magnet.

Engineers test their designs by measuring how far the magnet can reach and still pull the key, how many attempts it takes to retrieve the key, and whether the key stays attached during lifting. Good designs balance strength, length, and ease of use.

Table 1.

Design

Magnet Strength (Relative)

Retrieval Distance (cm)

Grip Reliability (%)

A

Weak

8

45

B

Medium

21

90

C

Strong

28

95

Graph of Information - Figure 1.

Bar graph titled 'Key Retrieval Distance by Design' comparing retrieval distance in centimeters for designs A, B, and C.

Graph of Information - Figure 2.

Bar graph titled 'Key Grip Reliability by Design' comparing grip reliability in percent for designs A, B, and C.

Asemmisa {{asɛmmisaAhyɛnsode}}
1.

What problem is the student trying to solve with a magnetic key holder and retrieval tool, and why is using hands not a good solution?

Asemmisa {{asɛmmisaAhyɛnsode}}
2.

Which design meets the requirement of retrieving the key from at least $20\text{ cm}$ away?

Asemmisa {{asɛmmisaAhyɛnsode}}
3.

Look at Table 1. How does magnet strength relate to retrieval distance across the three designs?

Asemmisa {{asɛmmisaAhyɛnsode}}
4.

Why does Design A fail to solve the design problem, even though it uses a magnet?

Asemmisa {{asɛmmisaAhyɛnsode}}
5.

Which design has the highest grip reliability, meaning the key is least likely to fall off during lifting?

Asemmisa {{asɛmmisaAhyɛnsode}}
6.

Which design (A, B, or C) best solves the problem of storing and retrieving a metal locker key using magnetic forces, and what evidence supports your choice?

Claim: State which design is best.


Evidence: Use data from the table or graphs.

Reasoning: Explain how the data shows the design meets the criteria.