Twa kɔ nsɛm atitiriw so
Log in
Sign up for FREE
arrow_back
Laabri

Sustainable Fisheries Management to Prevent Population Collapse - HS - BIOLOGY - Interdependent Relationships

star
star
star
star
star
Last updated about 2 months ago
6 Nsɛmmisa
Hyɛ no nsow a efi ɔkyerɛwfo no hɔ:

Directions: Use the information provided and your knowledge of Life Science to answer the following questions. Show all work where necessary.

Directions: Use the information provided and your knowledge of Life Science to answer the following questions. Show all work where necessary.

Sustainable Fisheries Management to Prevent Population Collapse

Diagram 1.

Source:

https://ar.inspiredpencil.com/pictures-2023/sustainable-fisheries

Diagram 2.

Graph titled Global Fishery Catch - 1950 to 2010 showing industrial, artisanal, subsistence, recreational, and discards catch in metric tons over time.Source:

https://wellbeingintl.org/sustainable-fisheries/

Ɛhia
2
DOK 1
HS-LS2-7
Ɛhia
4
DOK 2
HS-LS2-7
Ɛhia
4
DOK 2
HS-LS2-1
Ɛhia
4
DOK 2
HS-LS2-7
Ɛhia
4
DOK 2
HS-LS2-3
Ɛhia
6
DOK 3
HS-LS2-7

Many fish populations around the world have experienced severe declines due to overfishing. Human activities - including industrial harvesting, bycatch, destructive gear types, and unregulated fishing - can remove fish faster than populations can reproduce. When a fish stock drops below a critical threshold, recovery becomes extremely difficult, leading to long-term ecological and economic consequences. Sustainable fisheries management offers engineered, ecological, and policy-based solutions to reduce the impacts of human activity and maintain biodiversity.

A key strategy is establishing catch limits based on scientific stock assessments. These assessments use population models that incorporate spawning biomass, recruitment rates, age structure, and fishing pressure. When harvest levels are aligned with biological limits, fish populations can stabilize or recover. Another widely used solution is the creation of marine protected areas (MPAs), where fishing is restricted or prohibited. MPAs allow fish to grow larger, reproduce more often, and replenish surrounding areas through larval dispersal.

Gear modifications also reduce ecological impacts. For example, turtle excluder devices in shrimp trawls, circle hooks for longline fisheries, and bycatch-reduction nets help decrease the unintended capture of non-target species. Seasonal closures protect fish during key reproductive periods, and size limits prevent harvest of juveniles that have not yet spawned.

Evaluating these strategies requires mathematical data on population trends, bycatch rates, biomass, and biodiversity indicators. In many regions, fish populations show strong recovery after implementation of MPAs and catch limits. For example, studies demonstrate that biomass within no-take zones can increase several-fold within a decade. Similarly, gear improvements have reduced bycatch mortality for sea turtles, dolphins, and seabirds.

Designing and refining fisheries management requires balancing ecological and human needs. While harvest limits protect biodiversity, they must also be economically realistic for fishing communities. Students can analyze data comparing recovery rates in protected versus unprotected areas, examine biomass changes following catch-limit implementation, and consider trade-offs between management strategies.

Diagram 3.

Diagram showing High Fishing Effort leading to Stock Decline, then Biodiversity Loss, and finally Fishery Collapse Risk.

Table 1.

Location

Biomass Before tons/km

Biomass After tons/km

Percent Increase %

MPA NoTake

18

52

189

Partial Protection

22

38

73

Open Fishing Area

20

24

20

Graph of Information - Figure 1.

Table 2.

Year

Bycatch Mortality Index

Spawning Biomass tons

Fishing Effort hours x1000

2000

1

540

68

2005

0.82

590

61

2010

0.63

640

54

2015

0.52

710

50

2020

0.41

780

47

Graph of Information - Figure 2.

Asemmisa {{asɛmmisaAhyɛnsode}}
1.

According to Table 1, which location shows the highest percent increase in biomass after protection?

Asemmisa {{asɛmmisaAhyɛnsode}}
2.

Using Table 1 and Figure 1, describe one mathematical relationship between protection level and biomass change.

Asemmisa {{asɛmmisaAhyɛnsode}}
3.

Using the reading and Diagram 3, explain how catch limits based on scientific stock assessments help maintain carrying capacity for fish populations.

Asemmisa {{asɛmmisaAhyɛnsode}}
4.

Using Table 2 and Figure 2, describe how bycatch mortality, spawning biomass, and fishing effort changed from 2000 to 2020. Include one numerical comparison.

Asemmisa {{asɛmmisaAhyɛnsode}}
5.

Based on Table 2, in which year is fishing effort at its lowest?

Asemmisa {{asɛmmisaAhyɛnsode}}
6.

Evaluate the claim that sustainable fisheries management reduces human impacts on marine biodiversity by improving biomass, reducing bycatch, and supporting long-term population recovery.

Write a claim, provide evidence, and explain your reasoning.