Court Case Mapp v Ohio (HSA Model)

Last updated almost 8 years ago

16 questions

Note from the author:

This is a Document Based Question that is similar in style to the PARCC tests and aligns to the new 2020 Maryland High School Assessment ECR / Cluster Questions in its design.

Court Case Mapp v Ohio (HSA Model)

Court Case Mapp v Ohio (HSA Model)

Which piece of information from Source A supports the following claim: "The court overturned her conviction for being arrested for possession of lewd, salasious, or obscene material"

1. What are the major items that a person has protected against unreasonable government searches and seizures?
2. What conditions must exist for a warrant to be issued by the government to search an individuals property?

Which analysis of Source B is the MOST accurate?

First Paragraph of Document E
1. What types of items were taken in this court case?
2. Why should the conviction be reversed?

Second Paragraph of Document E
2. What "safeguards" are provided to the people in the 4th Amendment?

Which piece of information from Source E (Weeks vs United States, 1914 case) supports the claim that the court ruling against Weeks should be reversed? (careful, there is a correct and ALMOST correct answer here)

How does Source B corroborate (support) the information in Source E. (Look back at what both are referencing)

Analysis #1
1. How does the 4th Amendment support the idea of what we have previously covered regarding Zones of Privacy? Explain in 1-2 sentences.

The previous Weeks vs USA case bared the court from using evidence that was (paragraph 1)

The exclusion of evidence (not allowing it to be used) is a remedy (a solution) which directly serves only to protect a person when

Examine this last portion of document F, why did the Court refuse to apply the exclusionary rule to states?

In what circumstances would protection to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures NOT exist?

The 4th Amendment has been deemed to not work when protecting people from unreasonable searches and seizures by their State government. What Amendment grants the right to privacy under the due process law?

Explain in 1-2 sentences, why did the Court apply the exclusionary rule to the states?

Do you agree or disagree with the dissenting opinion's view of state's rights that the Bill of Rights applies only to the Federal (national) government? Explain why/why not in 2-3 sentences.

Which piece of information from Source A supports the following claim: "The court overturned her conviction for being arrested for possession of lewd, salasious, or obscene material"

1. What are the major items that a person has protected against unreasonable government searches and seizures?
2. What conditions must exist for a warrant to be issued by the government to search an individuals property?

Which analysis of Source B is the MOST accurate?

First Paragraph of Document E
1. What types of items were taken in this court case?
2. Why should the conviction be reversed?

Second Paragraph of Document E
2. What "safeguards" are provided to the people in the 4th Amendment?

Which piece of information from Source E (Weeks vs United States, 1914 case) supports the claim that the court ruling against Weeks should be reversed? (careful, there is a correct and ALMOST correct answer here)

How does Source B corroborate (support) the information in Source E. (Look back at what both are referencing)

Analysis #1
1. How does the 4th Amendment support the idea of what we have previously covered regarding Zones of Privacy? Explain in 1-2 sentences.

The previous Weeks vs USA case bared the court from using evidence that was (paragraph 1)

The exclusion of evidence (not allowing it to be used) is a remedy (a solution) which directly serves only to protect a person when

Examine this last portion of document F, why did the Court refuse to apply the exclusionary rule to states?

In what circumstances would protection to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures NOT exist?

The 4th Amendment has been deemed to not work when protecting people from unreasonable searches and seizures by their State government. What Amendment grants the right to privacy under the due process law?

Explain in 1-2 sentences, why did the Court apply the exclusionary rule to the states?

Do you agree or disagree with the dissenting opinion's view of state's rights that the Bill of Rights applies only to the Federal (national) government? Explain why/why not in 2-3 sentences.

Court Case Mapp v Ohio (HSA Model)

Court Case Mapp v Ohio (HSA Model)

Which piece of information from Source A supports the following claim: "The court overturned her conviction for being arrested for possession of lewd, salasious, or obscene material"

1. What are the major items that a person has protected against unreasonable government searches and seizures?2. What conditions must exist for a warrant to be issued by the government to search an individuals property?

Which analysis of Source B is the MOST accurate?

First Paragraph of Document E1. What types of items were taken in this court case?2. Why should the conviction be reversed?

Second Paragraph of Document E2. What "safeguards" are provided to the people in the 4th Amendment?

Which piece of information from Source E (Weeks vs United States, 1914 case) supports the claim that the court ruling against Weeks should be reversed? (careful, there is a correct and ALMOST correct answer here)

How does Source B corroborate (support) the information in Source E. (Look back at what both are referencing)

Analysis #11. How does the 4th Amendment support the idea of what we have previously covered regarding Zones of Privacy? Explain in 1-2 sentences.

The previous Weeks vs USA case bared the court from using evidence that was (paragraph 1)

The exclusion of evidence (not allowing it to be used) is a remedy (a solution) which directly serves only to protect a person when

Examine this last portion of document F, why did the Court refuse to apply the exclusionary rule to states?

In what circumstances would protection to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures NOT exist?

The 4th Amendment has been deemed to not work when protecting people from unreasonable searches and seizures by their State government. What Amendment grants the right to privacy under the due process law?

Explain in 1-2 sentences, why did the Court apply the exclusionary rule to the states?

Do you agree or disagree with the dissenting opinion's view of state's rights that the Bill of Rights applies only to the Federal (national) government? Explain why/why not in 2-3 sentences.

Which piece of information from Source A supports the following claim: "The court overturned her conviction for being arrested for possession of lewd, salasious, or obscene material"

1. What are the major items that a person has protected against unreasonable government searches and seizures?2. What conditions must exist for a warrant to be issued by the government to search an individuals property?

Which analysis of Source B is the MOST accurate?

First Paragraph of Document E1. What types of items were taken in this court case?2. Why should the conviction be reversed?

Second Paragraph of Document E2. What "safeguards" are provided to the people in the 4th Amendment?

Which piece of information from Source E (Weeks vs United States, 1914 case) supports the claim that the court ruling against Weeks should be reversed? (careful, there is a correct and ALMOST correct answer here)

How does Source B corroborate (support) the information in Source E. (Look back at what both are referencing)

Analysis #11. How does the 4th Amendment support the idea of what we have previously covered regarding Zones of Privacy? Explain in 1-2 sentences.

The previous Weeks vs USA case bared the court from using evidence that was (paragraph 1)

The exclusion of evidence (not allowing it to be used) is a remedy (a solution) which directly serves only to protect a person when

Examine this last portion of document F, why did the Court refuse to apply the exclusionary rule to states?

In what circumstances would protection to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures NOT exist?

The 4th Amendment has been deemed to not work when protecting people from unreasonable searches and seizures by their State government. What Amendment grants the right to privacy under the due process law?

Explain in 1-2 sentences, why did the Court apply the exclusionary rule to the states?

Do you agree or disagree with the dissenting opinion's view of state's rights that the Bill of Rights applies only to the Federal (national) government? Explain why/why not in 2-3 sentences.

1. What are the major items that a person has protected against unreasonable government searches and seizures?
2. What conditions must exist for a warrant to be issued by the government to search an individuals property?

First Paragraph of Document E
1. What types of items were taken in this court case?
2. Why should the conviction be reversed?

Second Paragraph of Document E
2. What "safeguards" are provided to the people in the 4th Amendment?

Analysis #1
1. How does the 4th Amendment support the idea of what we have previously covered regarding Zones of Privacy? Explain in 1-2 sentences.

1. What are the major items that a person has protected against unreasonable government searches and seizures?
2. What conditions must exist for a warrant to be issued by the government to search an individuals property?

First Paragraph of Document E
1. What types of items were taken in this court case?
2. Why should the conviction be reversed?

Second Paragraph of Document E
2. What "safeguards" are provided to the people in the 4th Amendment?

Analysis #1
1. How does the 4th Amendment support the idea of what we have previously covered regarding Zones of Privacy? Explain in 1-2 sentences.